Latest News

Jeff Jones is a regular contributor to The Green Blog, hosted by the Albany Times Union. He posts regularly on environment, clean energy and green jobs issues. Read the blog at http://blogs.timesunion.com/green/.

May 2009
Green Jobs TV Spot, Albany Times Union

March 30, 2009
Budget deal restores New York environmental funding, silive.com / Associated Press

March 29, 2009
Green jobs and the bottom line, Albany Times Union

March 3, 2009
NY poised to create green-collar workforce, New York Teacher

February 5, 2009
Jeff Jones named one of The 10 best regional writers, poets and journalists of the past 30 years, Metroland

January 28, 2009
Report to detail, address coastal pollution in NY, Associated Press

September 21, 2008
Regulatory Maze Creates Sustainable Energy Gridlock: Local governments undermine New York’s green energy goals, Network for New Energy Choices press release (Read the related Newsday article)

June 5, 2008
Lives spent on front line of history, Albany Times Union article

May 29, 2007
Act on brownfields, Albany Times Union editorial

May 4, 2007
Let's clean 'em up: Adjustments to the 2003 brownfields law will help fulfill its promise, Newsday Editorial

April 10, 2007
The following flyer was developed by peace and environmental activists in Fort Green, Brooklyn based on the politics of War and Warming (see No War for Oil/No Oil for War). It was designed to be used at local Step It Up activities on April 14th, and beyond. There is no sense of ownership here. Feel free to adapt and use this for future peace and environmental events.

Download the flyer: MS Word | PDF

March 7, 2007
Local anti-war activist Erin O'Brien says of this recent posting to MRZine.org by Jeff Jones and Eleanor Stein: "Eleanor Stein and Jeff Jones have written an important article about connecting the peace and antiwar crowd with the environmentalist movement. We all know that the war in iraq is a war for oil, and we often lament our consumption of petroleum products, but this article provides detailed analysis of what it would mean to really have a broad-based movement demanding No War for Oil, No Oil for War. Eleanor and Jeff provide compelling evidence of our society's overconsumption of fossil fuels, the media's success in downplaying the realities and consequences, and hope for how we can move forward to take back our nation's priorities. That's one of the most important aspects of this piece, I believe. It's one thing to talk about the problem, we hear an awful lot about what's wrong. It's another to offer insight into how we can reclaim our lives and our futures, and still have hope despite the great obstacles in our way." Read the full article, No War for Oil, No Oil for War.

Albany Times Union, July 18, 2006: Coalition Pushes Cleaner Future in New York; Labor, Environmentalists Form Apollo Alliance to Encourage Alternative Energy, "Green Collar" Jobs.

Monthly Review, June 6, 2006: Stirring the Pot, Remembering Stew Albert -- 1939-2006. By Jeff Jones.

Legislative Gazette, March 13, 2006: Environmentalists Want More for Water Protection.

Schenectady Gazette, Feb. 19, 2006: Jeff Jones appears on Environmental Justice Panel.

New Haven Advocate, Feb. 9, 2006: Mr. Tambourine Man, Remembering the Legendary Yippie, Stew Albert (1939-2006).

Legislative Gazette, Jan. 30, 2006: Environmentalists Thank New York Governor, George Pataki.

Adirondack Explorer, Jan/Feb, 2006: 4 Shades of Green, Park's Defenders Differ in Approach

Albany Times Union, Jan. 4, 2006: Checking in With Lobbyists

The New York Times, Jan. 1, 2006: An Ocean Agenda For New York

Newsday, Dec. 29, 2005: Save our Lakes, Ocean: Gov. Pataki, in State of State, Should Outline Ocean Stewardship Policy.

Gotham Gazette, Dec. 12, 2005: The Need for Healthier Schools.

Environmental Advocates Board of Directors Praises the Work of Jeff Jones -December 5, 2005

Jeff Jones Leaves Environmental Advocates

New York Times, May 28, 2005: Pataki Moves to Create Empire State Greenway by Developing 524-Mile Waterfront

Associated Press, Dec. 24, 2004: Book chronicles a radical family tree

Metroland Magazine, Nov. 18, 2004: Book chronicles two generations of family radicalism

Times Union, Oct. 7, 2004: Family memoir details radical life on the run

New York Times, Aug. 24, 2004: Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded

Associated Press, Oct. 13, 2001: Another century finds more waterways passable to the public

   

Lives spent on front line of history

By Jeff Jones, first published June 5, 2008, Times Union

Dramatic, moving moments of history provide certain markers in a lifetime. An early memory involves my parents waking me up in 1952 (I was 5) to tell me that Adlai Stevenson had won the Democratic Party nomination for President. I vividly recall sitting in my high school Spanish class in 1963 when word came that John F. Kennedy had been killed in Dallas.

Capital Communications Federal Credit Union The year 1968 provided more than its share of such memories. Two months and a day before Robert Kennedy was shot in Los Angeles, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was gunned down in Memphis. These, along with the student uprising at Columbia University and the protests outside the Democratic convention in Chicago provide images still vivid 40 years later.

On the evening of the day King was killed, I roamed Times Square, watching the police lose control of the streets and the start of a night of looting. In the days following that national trauma, riots occurred in 125 U.S. cities. In Washington, fires reached within six blocks of the White House. Machine guns were mounted on the lawn and on the balcony of the Capitol. Nationwide, 46 people were killed, 2,500 injured, and 70,000 troops -- Army and National Guard -- augmented local police forces to restore order.

Less than three weeks later, at Columbia University, I climbed in a back window and joined several thousand striking students occupying five buildings. We were protesting the school's planned taking of public land in Harlem's Morningside Park for a Jim Crow-style gymnasium and a secret military research projects that made it complicit in the Vietnam War. After eight days, when the police retook the campus, I was one of 1,100 students and community members arrested. I avoided arrest in Chicago in August. My girlfriend, high heels and all, and I outran a cop late one night. On another evening, we ducked down an alley as police bullets were flying. But, when the Democratic Party handed the nomination to Hubert Humphrey over Eugene McCarthy, and the blood flowed in the streets outside, we stood there chanting, "The Whole World is Watching!" And it was.

My memory of Robert Kennedy's assassination is less precise. I was barely 21 and already alienated from the national political process, freshly arrested at Columbia and getting ready for Chicago. Like many, I was becoming numb to the violence, wrung out and without faith that anything good would come from working within the system.

RFK's murder was more evidence that something was terribly wrong with America, that the system in place would not change. That year, more than 14,500 Americans would be killed fighting in Vietnam, along with countless Vietnamese. The assassination of Robert Kennedy, who I believed was an opponent of the Vietnam War, and Humphrey's pro-war triumph over McCarthy, steeled my resolve to work outside the system.

I concluded then that real progress would only happen under pressure from movements and organizations independent of the dominant political parties. To this day, I look first to the peace, justice and environmental movements for guidance and hope.

Jeff Jones is a consultant and lobbyist in Albany, working mainly on environmental issues.

Act on Brownfields

First published May 29, 2007, Times Union

New York's landmark 2003 brownfield law is flawed and needs fixing. It also happens to be a textbook example of what can go wrong when negotiations are held in the middle of the night, rather than in public, as Governor Spitzer now insists, as he and legislative leaders try to reach agreement on pending issues. The law was rushed through during one of the Legislature's infamous marathon sessions, albeit with the best of intentions. Lawmakers had hoped to spur development of contaminated sites, mostly in urban areas and upstate, by offering developers generous tax incentives to build there.

But it didn't take long before the flaws were exposed. Tax credits of up to 22 percent were pegged not only to a developer's cost of cleaning up a contaminated site, but also to the cost of construction itself. That meant big developers in Manhattan could save millions of dollars even if their cleanup costs were relatively modest. A case in point: The firm behind the New York Times Tower in midtown Manhattan applied for $170 million in tax credits for the $850 million project, even though cleanup costs were less than $1 million.

When the loophole was exposed, embarrassed state officials moved to rewrite the rules and disqualify the Times project. But they also tightened rules to a point that discouraged smaller development projects that could have large community benefits, such as affordable housing. And the overall goal of the credit program, to clean up thousands of contaminated sites statewide, remains elusive. So far, only 25 projects have been approved, with another 148 applications under review.

All this could change for the better, however, if Governor Spitzer and legislative leaders add brownfield reform to their priority list for the end of this year's regular session. As it happens, there is a blueprint for just such reform in a new report by the New Partnership for Community Revitalization, a not-for-profit organization of banks, community groups, builders and environmentalists. The group wisely suggests that the tax credit program be targeted at areas plagued with poverty, crime or dwindling population. Just as important, the report recommends separate tax credits for clean-ups and redevelopment.

Many brownfield sites are in urban areas that, sadly, fit the group's criteria all too well, which is why most lenders today will not finance any redevelopment there. But a tax credit program properly targeted to areas most in need of revitalization could lure the financing needed to get things done. First, though, Mr. Spitzer, Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver must act -- and soon.

Let's clean 'em up

Adjustments to the 2003 brownfields law will help fulfill its promise

May 4, 2007

It took years of negotiation to craft the 2003 state brownfields law, which was designed to help turn contaminated, unproductive land and buildings into clean developments that pay taxes and help the community. But almost four years later, that law needs tweaking.

One of the law's sections, the brownfield cleanup program, offers tax credits to firms that clean up the sites, once the Department of Environmental Conservation certifies that the cleanup is satisfactory. But as the program unfolded, the state looked at the potential dimensions of these tax credits and realized that they could cost New York a bundle. So, the state has tightened the rules, which reduces its liability but also slows down the pace of greening up thousands of brownfields.

Another major approach to brownfields is more innovative: The brownfield opportunity area program is designed to draw in citizens and developers to clean up entire neighborhoods. That makes sense. If someone cleans up one contaminated site, but others nearby remain unchanged, that doesn't help the community.

As sound as the concept is, the execution has lagged. For one thing, the opportunity area programs have required a memorandum of understanding between the legislature and the governor. These take forever to obtain and slow things down.

Luckily, the new budget seems to have eliminated the language that requires these memoranda in the future. Next, the legislature needs to put up financial incentives to draw developers into the brownfield opportunity area program. It should link the tax credits already in the law to the opportunity area program - and fix all the other defects in an immensely promising law that has not worked well yet.

Copyright 2007 Newsday Inc.

 

Coalition pushes cleaner future in New York

Labor, environmentalists form Apollo Alliance to encourage alternative energy, "green collar" jobs

By LARRY RULISON, Business writer
First published: Tuesday, July 18, 2006

ALBANY -- A collection of business, labor and environmental groups has come together to promote clean-energy technology and construction projects in the state.

 

The New York State Apollo Alliance was launched Monday at a news conference at the Legislative Office Building in Albany. Its members include the Environmental Business Association of New York State, the Sierra Club, United Steelworkers and New York State United Teachers, among others.

Officials from the groups pointed to countries like Japan and Germany as leaders in the use and development of renewable-energy technologies such as solar power. They said New York can aspire to be more like those nations by investing heavily in the sector.

"It generates lots of opportunities," said Ira Rubenstein, executive director of the Environmental Business Association of New York State, a trade group based in Albany. "They've been focused on their policy for 20 years, and it pays."

The new group is affiliated with the Apollo Alliance, a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C. The New York group is the 11th state chapter to be created.

Alternative energy has been a huge focus of political and business leaders in the Capital Region. Gov. George Pataki and the Legislature have supported alternative-energy projects and business development in the state, and local universities -- including the University at Albany and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute -- already have major alternative-energy research and development programs in place.

The region also is home to emerging alternative-energy companies like DayStar Technologies Inc. of Halfmoon, which makes solar cells; Plug Power Inc. and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc., two Colonie companies that make fuel cells; and SuperPower Inc., a Schenectady company that is developing superconducting wire for the utility and defense industries. GE Wind, General Electric Co.'s wind power operation, also is headquartered in Schenectady.

But Jeff Jones, project director for New York Apollo, who also is a consultant to the Workforce Development Institute in Albany, said the group's creation was important because it brought together labor and environmental interests. Jones called it a "blue-green" alliance.

"It's a unique coalition," he said.

The group has developed a 10-point plan that it also unveiled Monday. It asked political candidates to embrace its causes, but said it would not endorse any candidates.

The plan calls for the construction and retrofitting of buildings and schools that use less energy and have healthier environments.

It also calls for the creation of thousands of "green collar" jobs through the promotion of research and development and manufacturing in the alternative-energy sector. New incentives could be created by investments from state and local pension funds, and the business community would be encouraged to invest in these new technologies. The group estimates that at least 20,000 new manufacturing jobs could be created this way.

The plan also calls for the expansion of urban spaces and promotion of bike- and pedestrian-friendly communities. And it encourages development of mass-transit networks such as light rail with a reduction in waste and an increase in recycling.

William Pienta, district director of United Steelworkers District 4 in Cheektowaga, near Buffalo, said New York could benefit from additional wind turbine manufacturing. He pointed to Pennsylvania, which attracted Spanish wind-turbine manufacturer Gamesa Corp. to build a manufacturing and regional headquarters.

"This is a major industry that can go anywhere," Pienta said. "I want some of that in New York state."

Rulison can be reached at 454-5504 or by e-mail at lrulison@timesunion.com.

Positive outlook

A study completed by The Perryman Group, an economic consultant in Waco, Texas, found that the Apollo Alliance's New York efforts could create: $15.1 billion in economic activity $9.6 billion in increased income 228,100 new jobs, including:

31,320 new manufacturing jobs

25,635 new construction jobs

BACK TO TOP

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

Mr. Tambourine Man, Remembering the Legendary Yippie, Stew Albert (1939-2006).

By Jeff Jones

Stew Albert had one of his smart, funny ideas when he was thinking about a name for his memoir. My Sixties, he said was going to call it. He was in his late fifties when we kicked this one around and I thought the irony was sublime: He knew the book wouldn’t be out until he had turned the numerical corner.

Stew didn't call his book My Sixties—the title is still out there, if someone with a lifetime of movement cred wants to grab it. Instead, he called it Who The Hell is Stew Albert?

Who indeed?

The title is a quote from Howard Stern, who once responded with that question when one of his on-air gang started talking about Stew as if everyone in the world knew who he was. Stern didn’t, but that was his loss: It always seemed to me that Stew knew everyone and everyone knew Stew.

Nobody was more devoted to the idea of the Sixties. If you want to see what I mean, visit his website (http://members.aol.com/stewa/stew.html). Stew worked hard to translate Sixties values to a new generation of political activists. He kept in touch with a wide array of movement veterans, loyal and engaged, blogging his thoughts and poems every day—right up until his penultimate day.

Younger activists adored him.

He died January 30th.

Stew was big and barrel-chested, with curly blond hair and piercing blue eyes. Losing Stew—he was 66 when he fell to liver cancer—creates a huge personal, political and emotional hole for me, as I know it does for so many others, especially his wife, Judy “Gumbo” Clavir Albert, and his daughter, Jessica Pearl. The Albert’s post-1960s peregrinations—Bay Area, Hudson Valley, back to the West Coast—finally landed them in Portland, Ore. Years of fighting various ailments kept Stew close to home, and close to his computer where he became the most successful sixties radical I know at moving to online activism. Whenever we met, we spent hours catching up on the latest gossip about the doings of various old Panthers, Yippies and Weathermen. And then we would plot and scheme, mostly about how to support those emerging young activists devoted to resistance to racism, environmental catastrophe and Bush’s oil wars.

How I met Stew says something about who he was. That is, I don’t remember how I met him. I remember the first time I met the other Yippie founders: Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul Krassner. But Stew just appeared in my life one day, and he never left.

To one degree or another, the founding Yippies were all nuts. It was their strength, their weakness, their charisma and their charm (for Abbie, in particular, it was also his doom).

Stew was different. He always had a strategy and a plan. He managed the campaign of Pigasus the Pig for president in 1968 and ran for sheriff of Alameda County in 1970 (He lost, but carried the city of Berkeley). More than anyone, he helped Abbie and Jerry give definition to the Yippie movement. Without his ability to broker their competitive egos and channel their ideas into strategy, what is passing into history as the Yippie story would have been different, definitely diminished and possibly disregarded.

The Sixties were filled with political tendencies: anarchism, communism, socialism, the working class, armed revolution, Panthers, Weathermen, Maoism. It wasn’t easy to find one’s way and keep one’s head. (The lineup may be different today, but it’s not any easier.) In this political stew, Stew Albert was a cultural radical with a political ideology. We bonded because I was a political radical struggling to blend New Left ideology with the cultural power of young people. We found ourselves speaking the same language, and stayed friends to the end.

Along the way we had some adventures. When the Weathermen helped Timothy Leary escape from a California prison and make his way to an uncertain reception at Eldridge Cleaver’s expatriot compound in Algeria, Stew went over to help with the introduction.

Long before today’s wiretaps, Stew and Judy were being watched and tailed by the FBI. After the Weather Underground bombed the U.S. Capitol in 1971 to protest the Vietnam War, they famously declared: “We didn’t do it, but we dug it.” 

We last spoke on New Year’s day. That was just after his email arrived letting his many friends know that doctors had just found the cancer and that it was bad. His daily blog told the unfolding story of his fading hopes for a cure, his joyful, if tiring, visits with friends. Daughter Jessica came home from law school to be with him, and his happiness grew having her near. Two days before the end, he blogged to the world that “my politics have not changed.” No death- bed conversions or regrets for a life lived radically and well, in constant resistance to a government and political system he abhorred. As Stew slipped away, he posted his final words: “It’s still me. It’s still me.” n

BACK TO TOP 

 

 

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

4 Shades of Green - Adirondack Explorer

Park's defenders differ in approach
By Phil Brown

The Adirondack Club and Resort could be the biggest development in the history of the Adirondack Park: It calls for more than 700 condominiums, single-family homes and “Great Camps” to be built on 6,400 acres on the outskirts of the village of Tupper Lake.

Supporters say the project—which also calls for reopening the Big Tupper Ski Area—would turn around the economy of a village that has been down on its luck for years. But opponents say the development would set a bad example for the rest of the Park.
So where do the Park’s environmental watchdogs stand?

• The Association for the Protection of the Adirondacks has taken a stand against the project. David Gibson, the executive director, calls such a huge development “fundamentally wrong for the Adirondack Park.”

• The Residents’ Committee to Protect the Adirondacks wants the state to buy 3,000 acres of the land eyed by the developers—as well as adjacent lands—and create a 20,000-acre Wilderness Area.

• The Adirondack Council is suggesting that the Olympic Regional Development Authority take over the Big Tupper Ski Area and that the state preserve as much of the surrounding land as possible.

• The Adirondack Mountain Club has several worries, such as that the influx of seasonal residents may lead to the overuse of nearby Forest Preserve tracts, but the club is waiting for the developer to submit a final application before adopting an official position.

The four groups by and large share the same concerns over the project (including forest fragmentation and scenic blight).
Nevertheless, their divergent positions reflect both the strength and weakness of the environmental movement in the Adirondacks. On the one hand, the multiplicity of perspectives fosters a lively public debate and makes it less likely that a good idea gets overlooked. On the other hand, the groups probably wield more clout when they speak with one voice.

The question is whether the environmental groups strike the proper balance between independence and cooperation. And the answer will depend on the issue—and on where the person answering stands on that issue.

In general, though, most green-minded observers argue that the advantages of having several organizations fighting for the Park outweigh the disadvantages caused by their failure to agree or work together on every matter.

Jeff Jones, a political consultant in Albany who used to work for Environmental Advocates, a statewide organization, said politicians at the state Capitol may never set foot in the Adirondacks, but they get the message that it’s a special place by virtue of the fact that so many people lobby on its behalf.

Jones is one who sees the groups’ differences as more of a plus than a minus. “You could take all the resources and put them into one great, big organization, but then you’d lack the diversity,” he said. “It’s good to have the tension and disagreements fought out in public rather than kept inside a boardroom.”

BACK TO TOP

 

 

Taking An Interest

Times Union, Jan. 4, 2006

The Times Union checked in with a number of lobbyists and interest groups for various issues to see what they expect from Gov. George Pataki's final State of the State address this afternoon, and will touch base with them after the speech to see if it lived up to, surpassed or failed to meet their expectations.

"We expect him to talk again about the need to reduce the nation's highest tax burden. We expect to hear about workers' compensation costs. We hope to hear about the need to reduce energy costs ... Will his potential political ambitions motivate what he says or how he says it? I don't know, and I'm not sure it's knowable. Frankly, we're more interested in what he proposes and what gets done than any motivation external to the issue.'' Matthew Maguire, spokesman, Business Council of New York State

"I think we're going to see a national campaign speech. He's going to be moving to the right, talking about tax cuts, reducing crime and Medicaid reform. I expect to see all these things. This is a governor who is running for president, there's a tremendous amount of overlap between his fiscal conservative agenda and our agenda of the wise use of tax dollars ... I am cautiously optimistic that he'll talk about the waste of contracting out.'' Roger Benson, president, New York State Public Employees Federation

"After vetoing the unintended pregnancy prevention act last year, the governor said he would work to expand access to emergency contraception. We expect him to honor that commitment to the women of New York.'' JoAnn M. Smith, president and CEO of Family Planning Advocates of New York

"Our top agenda item is sex education, but we haven't heard any commitments on that yet from the governor's office, whereas he's made a commitment to the emergency contraception issue. (Will he mention it?) We hope that he will.'' Susan Pedo, FPA, director of public affairs and communications

"I would expect a hard core Republican message like the one he started out with: Crime, welfare and taxes ... If he is running for president, I expect some red meat for the conservative base ... I'd love to hear him talk about serving the most vulnerable people with Medicaid cards in their pockets, but I expect if Medicaid is mentioned, it will would be more as a source for budget cuts.'' Michael Kink, lobbyist

"We are hopeful that the governor's going to announce an increase in spending in the environmental protection fund; we've been trying to get it up to 2 cents on the dollar for the last couple of years. Last year, there was a $25 million increase to $150 million, and this year, we are looking forward to another increase. I think that will help the governor achieve some of the legacy goals that he is setting for his last year in office.'' Jeff Jones, environmental lobbyist

"I'm hoping that he'll say that in better times, which I believe this is, the state will pay long-overdue attention to hard-pressed community providers who haven't seen increases of any note in a decade. I'm hoping that he will push for a civil confinement legislation that will house sex offenders in correctional facilities not mental health facilities. ... I'm hoping, and have reason to believe, that he may be looking to shore up the safety net by giving increases to providers who each day keep people who have serious psychiatric problems out of hospitals, homeless shelters, prisons, jails and emergency rooms.'' Harvey Rosenthal, executive director, New York Association of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services

"The State of the State is typically more about the state of the governor and what image he's playing to the public. I expect this will be more his attempt to write the first draft of history's review of his tenure. We will be looking for whether he will use this opportunity to push for reform. ... The big question really is: Will the governor see his audience as a national audience or just a state one? I don't know if we're going to be able to tell from the State of the State.'' Blair Horner, lobbyist, New York Public Interest Research Group

"The challenge for him is: How do you unveil any kind of exciting new agenda, assuming he even has one, when you're a lame duck? ... The first State of the State is always the one that has impact, because a new governor is somebody who is perceived to have a following wind and a mandate. He arrives in a honeymoon period and has everybody listening to him. When you're in your 12th year, and everybody has pretty much decided they know exactly what you're about and are counting the hours until you're gone, it's difficult.'' E.J. McMahon, director of the Empire Center of the Manhattan Institute

BACK TO TOP

 

 

 

An Ocean Agenda for New York

New York Times Editorial, January 1, 2006

It's no secret that the oceans are under siege. In recent years, two major commissions - the Congressionally established United States Commission on Ocean Policy and the independent Pew Oceans Commission - have urged prompt action to end overfishing of commercially valuable species, reduce pollution from cities and farms, restore wetlands and control development along the coasts. Obviously, a problem of this magnitude requires intervention by Washington and even international organizations, but the states - which control waters up to three miles offshore - also have important roles to play.

With that in mind, some states, notably California, have recently strengthened their laws and overhauled the way they manage ocean resources. Now a coalition of environmental groups is urging Gov. George Pataki to do the same.

Over the years, New York has done much to protect its marine assets - its 1,850 miles of tidal shoreline, its many beaches and its rich assortment of distinct coastal environments, notably the South Shore of Long Island, Long Island Sound and the Hudson River estuary. But the challenges keep growing.

Nearly 40 percent of coastal waters fail to meet either state or federal water quality standards, catches for big commercial fish species have declined, and in some areas shellfish stocks have crashed. The yield in Great South Bay, once one of the most productive clamming areas along the East Coast, is a mere 2 percent of what it was in 1976.

There are any number of sensible steps that can be taken. The most obvious is to improve coordination and accountability among the many agencies with jurisdiction over marine resources. This could be done by executive order or, as California did, with legislation conferring power on an interagency council to help set policy and coordinate action on the entire range of ocean-related issues, from upgrading sewage treatment to preserving wetlands to curbing coastal sprawl.

Meanwhile, state laws could be strengthened to help end overfishing. Protected zones for shellfish could be established until their populations recover. The governor could use his influence to broaden the range of candidates nominated to the industry-dominated regional councils that determine catch limits, adding more scientists and conservationists to the mix. An increase in the state's Environmental Protection Fund would strengthen research and improve law enforcement.

All this may require some knocking together of heads in Albany. But legislators like Long Island's Thomas DiNapoli, the chairman of the Standing Committee on Environmental Conservation, stand ready to help move things forward.

The issue would seem a natural for Mr. Pataki. He cares about conservation and he knows something about marine issues, having served on the Pew Commission. Adding the oceans to his to-do list could only enhance his environmental legacy.

BACK TO TOP

 

 

Save our Lakes, Ocean: Gov. Pataki, in State of State, Should Outline Ocean Stewardship Policy.

December 29, 2005

Something hopeful is stirring in both the executive and legislative branches of New York State government: a real awareness of the declining numbers of finfish and shellfish, caused by overfishing, loss of habitat and other stresses on the state's waters. Next week, in his final State of the State message, Gov. George Pataki should seize on that dawning mindfulness and begin to outline his vision for a world-class New York approach to enlightened ocean stewardship.

Pataki has earned a reputation for environmental leadership, and now he has a chance to build on that. In fact, he's showing signs that he's ready. In late October, a few days after Assemb. Thomas DiNapoli (D-Great Neck) chaired a Jones Beach hearing on ocean issues, Pataki hosted an ocean and Great Lakes symposium in New York City.

The symposium briefing paper began with a reminder about two recent reports that have laid the groundwork for future efforts to save our oceans: one from the independent Pew Oceans Commission, the other from the congressionally created U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. Despite their differing origins, the two commissions reached similar conclusions about the broad threats to our oceans, such as overfishing, habitat destruction and declining water quality. And they made specific calls for action.

As the symposium brief makes clear, New York has a real stake in protecting its waters: hundreds of miles of Atlantic and Great Lakes shoreline, 1,530 square miles of bays and estuaries on Long Island, and an annual $11.5 billion in economic activity flowing from seafood, sport and commercial fishing and industries that depend on them.

But that industry is hurting here. As Sarah Chasis of the Natural Resources Defense Council and David Conover of Stony Brook University's Marine Sciences Research Center told DiNapoli's committee, the weight of seafood at New York docks is just 25 percent of what it was 50 years ago.

The two commission reports provide a factual basis. Now Pataki should use the State of the State to call for legislation that will set up a permanent ocean council to coordinate all state policy for preserving our waters. It would be great if he used the speech to commit New York to ecosystem-based management, an approach that looks at all marine life as an organic whole, not as a series of isolated species to be exploited. Then he should spend his final year in office launching this pivotal initiative.

Copyright 2005 Newsday Inc.

BACK TO TOP

 

The Need for Healthier Schools

by Stephen Boese
December 12, 2005

Most people think all asbestos was removed from New York City public schools years ago. So participants in a New York State Assembly hearing on healthy schools earlier this year were shocked to learn that last year construction workers who were replacing a gym floor at P.S. 219 in Brownsville, Brooklyn inadvertently released the flaky white substance throughout the building. The school was shut down immediately for an emergency cleanup. Student and faculty health was jeopardized, and valuable learning time was lost.

The legislators were even more shocked to learn that no one knows how many other New York City school buildings still contain asbestos; records at the Department of Education are incomplete.

At the Healthy Schools Network, our files are filled with reports from parents and teachers who are struggling to deal with unusual and unnerving illnesses affecting their children, students and coworkers. But it is not possible to do a scientific study to see if environmental conditions in their schools are at fault. The data is simply not available; neither city nor state officials keep track. But ignoring the problem will not make it go away.

ILLNESSES AND ABSENCES

Students spend nearly a quarter of their waking hours in school buildings that parents trust are safe. Unfortunately, there are real reasons for concern in many public schools. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has said that environmental health hazards like mold infestations, toxic chemicals, diesel fumes and contaminated renovation debris, along with other pollutants such as pesticides and toxic cleaning and maintenance products, can foul a school’s indoor air quality. In fact, the EPA estimates that about half of the nation's schools have poor indoor air, a major health hazard. In the winter, as schools shut their windows and children spend more time indoors, the problem becomes even worse.

In New York City, the state Assembly heard testimony from Avril Dannenbaum, whose seven-year-old son attended PS 111 in Manhattan. He has a chronic infection that compromises his immune system. His mother says she can manage his infection and his seasonal allergies at home. “But then,” she explained, “if you add on environmental allergens in his school, such as a dirty rug to sit on, peeling, flaking paint from the walls and window sills, along with industrial cleaning products and insecticides, you have a child who comes close to shutdown. Then he is unable to learn or function in class.”

While many problems afflict older schools, new ones are not immune. Tests found high levels of two chlorine solvents at a new high school in the Soundview section of the Bronx, hastily constructed in an old Loral Electronics factory. Both are known to cause serious ailments, including cancer. Assured by authorities that the vapors were below threat levels, parents later found out that city tests of soil and ground water at the site had revealed serious lead, mercury, cadmium, and chromium contamination.

A PROBLEM IGNORED

With parents, the press, and the political establishment all demanding tougher academic standards and higher test scores, physical conditions in the schools tend to be ignored. Proposals abound for how the city might spend the billions it is owed under the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit, but none of them includes any mention of using some of the money to make schools more environmentally healthy.

These health policies and practices have a direct impact on academic achievement and efficient allocation of education funds for every child. Poor environmental conditions in schools sicken students, teachers and staff, and inhibit academic performance. And our neediest children also need the healthiest schools. Poor school facilities contribute to a poor leaning environment that can undermine children’s health, attendance and test scores.

The American Lung Association, along with the federal Centers for Disease Control and the EPA, agree that asthma is the number one reason for school absenteeism due to chronic disease in New York’s schools. The city has some of the worst asthma rates in the nation, and the disease is epidemic in many neighborhoods, especially communities of color and among the poor. Public health officials studying urban asthma think a cleaner classroom environment could help control the crisis.

CLEARING THE AIR

There is some good news to report. Coal boilers, which remained in some New York City schools for more than 20 years after they were outlawed in other facilities, have now all been removed. In 1999, the state Education Department issued minimal standards and procedures for school indoor environmental quality and health and safety. State legislation has banned arsenic-infused pressure treated wood (commonly used in playground equipment), pesticide-laden cake toilet deodorizers and elemental mercury (a potent neurotoxin) in schools. Schools must now provide notification when they plan to apply toxic pesticides.

In August, Governor George Pataki signed legislation requiring schools to use environmentally preferable (green) cleaning products. The state Office of General Services already does this for state facilities, so the healthy products are readily available. Reducing student and staff exposure to industrial strength chemicals will help reduce school absenteeism. The program will take effect with the start of the September 2006 school year.

Both the city and state are moving toward implementing guidelines to assure that all school construction and renovations meet high standards for health. In New York City, a broad coalition of environmental, labor, health and healthy schools advocates were pleased when the City Council passed a green building standards bill earlier this year and Mayor Michael Bloomberg signed it into law in October. This significant legislation requires that all public construction, including schools, meet standards for environmentally friendly – or green – buildings by January 2007. By requiring better ventilation and barring the use of toxic paints, carpets and other materials, this measure will help improve student health and performance.

WHAT MORE CAN BE DONE

Now it is time to take further steps. Fortunately, protecting our children will not add billions to the cost of education.

At the federal level, Senator Hillary Clinton secured amendments to the 2002 No Child Left Behind law, which for the first time defined healthy and high performance school standards in federal law. This legislation required a comprehensive federal study of how school environmental quality affects student health and learning. But Washington’s follow-through has been flawed. The report, which was produced last year, has yet to be released to the public. Clinton’s initiative also established a grant program for states to spur the development of healthier schools. Unfortunately, Congress has neglected to fund this despite intensive advocacy by the National Coalition for Healthier Schools (in .pdf format), a coalition of over 300 organizations and individuals led by the Healthy Schools Network.

New York State also needs to do more. Albany offers a Green Building Tax Credit that gives incentives to commercial developers to design and construct green buildings, but the credit is not available for schools. Pataki has signed an executive order that requires all state public construction to meet the standards of the Green Building Tax Credit. But while the state recommends that schools meet those standards, it does not require them to do so. That should change.

And the state should move ahead on initiatives already in the works, such as a joint project of the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority and the State Education Department to develop healthy and high performance school design standards. The legislature should pass a bill introduced by Senator James Alesi and Assemblymember Steven Englebright that would require healthy and high performance design standards for all New York schools.

For parents, teachers and school staff, such improvements cannot come soon enough. As Avril Dannenbaum told state lawmakers about her child, “I can make his home as safe as possible, but it’s at school that he needs to be able to function well to learn optimally. I’d like you to make his school a safe place where he can study and reach his full potential.”

Stephen Boese is the New York State director of the Healthy Schools Network

BACK TO TOP

 

Environmental Advocates of New York

Board of Directors Resolution

Whereas, Jeff Jones has served Environmental Advocates for more than ten years as Director of Communications, and in that capacity has made a significant contribution to protect the people, wildlife, and natural resources of New York State; and

Whereas, Jeff has played a leadership role in efforts to restore the historic Hudson River, to protect the majestic Adirondack and Catskill Mountains, to address pressing urban environmental problems, and to secure more funding for pivotal state environmental programs, and has advanced numerous other vitally important environmental, public health, and environmental justice issues throughout News York State and beyond; and

Whereas, Jeff has deftly educated the media, policy-makers, and the public at large, including scores of school children each year at Earth Day Lobby Day, about environmental issues as they unfolded at the State Capitol; and

Whereas, Jeff has been a treasured colleague, friend, and mentor to many Environmental Advocates staff members and board members, providing guidance and support often with humor and patience on a broad range of cutting-edge environmental issues;

Be it resolved that the Board of Directors of Environmental Advocates expresses its sincere appreciation for Jeff’s hard work and dedication to protecting New York’s environment and extends its best wishes to Jeff for his continued success in all his future endeavors.

 Signed:

Irv Flinn, President

December 5, 2005

 BACK TO TOP

 

 

August 26, 2005

To Whom It May Concern:

After more than 10 years as communications director of Environmental Advocates, I and the organization have agreed that the time has come for me to explore other options in my professional career. I move on from Environmental Advocates with a feeling of great satisfaction for all that we have accomplished during the past decade.

-       Many New Yorkers are less exposed to pesticides in their daily lives than they were 10 years ago, thanks to the state's pesticide registry and neighbor notification law.

-       State health officials are better able to fight New York's debilitating asthma epidemic, thanks to the expansion of the system that collects data on hospital admissions to include emergency room visits.

-       The federal government has ordered General Electric to clean toxic PCBs from the Hudson River.

-       New York has the best brownfields law in the country, and the foundation has been laid for an urban revitalization program that will successfully direct tax dollars and development back to the state's cities, while at the same time relieving some of the pressure of sprawling development on greenfields and working farms.

-       The state Environmental Protection Fund is again growing to help protect New York's natural resources, wilderness areas and working farms.

-       Toxic cleaning products will be removed from our children's schools.

-       New York is taking steps to control emissions of pollutants that cause global warming.

-       Renewable energy sources, including wind power, are increasing in the state as a cost-efficient alternative to fossil fuels.

-       Historic efforts are underway to protect the Great Lakes watershed from exploitation and misuse.

Environmental Advocates has been at the center of my advocacy work for the past 10 years. I want to thank all those I have worked with in the organization during this time. I especially want to thank my colleagues on staff for their ambitious, relentless and creative efforts to protect New York's environment, fighting for clean water, clean air and the health of our families. I have every confidence that the organization will continue to play a leading role in New York's environmental movement and that it deserves our full support.

Signed:

Jeff Jones

BACK TO TOP

 
Thai Jones chronicles two generations of family radicalism

By Stephen Leon, Metroland Magazine

Witnesses to a century

In the early ’90s, when Jeff Jones worked at Metroland as a staff writer, his teenage son Thai used to drop by our offices with his friends. In their ragtag appearance, their shuffling gait, their often-sullen facial expressions, they looked like stereotypical bored teenagers, perhaps with mischief on their minds, not quite comfortable among the adults in Dad’s office. Metroland’s founder, Peter Iselin, repeated a standing joke every time we watched them skulk through our corridors: He’d lean to me and exclaim, in mock disapproval, “Subversives!”

In March 1970, a bomb-making accident blew up a Greenwich Village townhouse and killed three members of Students for a Democratic Society, the most radical (and violent) faction of which was evolving into the Weather Underground. Later that month, Jeff Jones was scheduled to appear in a Chicago courtroom to face charges stemming from his prominent role in the October 1969 street brawl with cops known as the Days of Rage. With federal investigators intensifying their efforts to track down radicals like Jones, and with a looming court date—which Jones planned to skip, officially making him a fugitive—he decided to visit his father in California before going underground so his dad might worry a little less if he didn’t hear from him for years. Albert Jones, a Quaker and a pacifist who had refused to fight in World War II, agreed with his son about many things—but not the Weathermen’s embracing the tactic of violence. “Son, I believe very strongly in your goals,” he had told Jeff just before the Days of Rage. “But if you set out to hurt somebody, I would hope and pray that you are hurt first.”

The description of the brief meeting of father and son in A Radical Line is full of the kind of detail that humanizes the book’s sweeping political saga. “Albert preferred not to know what his son was up to, and Jeff was in no hurry to fill him in,” writes Thai Jones in his book, released last month by Free Press. “Still, the comforts of the family nest—sitting on the sofa drinking a beer and watching TV—were a welcome change from the rigors of organizing. In the evening, Jeff walked out of the house and wandered through the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, listening to the coyotes as the sun swept west across the valley.”

A Radical Line: From the Labor Movement to the Weather Underground, One Family’s Century of Conscience chronicles two generations of activist family history: the author’s parents, Jeff Jones and Eleanor Stein, and their activities with the SDS and the Weather Underground at the height of the ’60s protest era; the Communist affiliation and civil-rights and labor activism of Eleanor’s parents, Arthur and Annie Stein; and the deeply felt pacifism of Albert Jones, whose conscientious objection to World War II landed him in an isolated work camp far from his new wife. Throughout, it is a story not only of the century’s most significant leftist political movements, but also of one family’s struggles to balance their radical commitments with the burdens such a life can bestow on spouses, sons and daughters, and parents. “I never wanted it to just be a memoir,” Jones says. “My picture was, a history of these movements, told through the prism of the family.”

When Jeff and Thai Jones sat down to be interviewed for this story earlier this week, Eleanor was not with them: She prefers not to be interviewed, and has chosen to let Jeff and Thai do all the talking. This is mildly ironic, given that the book originally was her idea. While Thai was studying for a masters at Columbia Journalism School, he wanted to take a popular book-writing class taught by Sam Friedman—but needed a book proposal in order to enroll. “So at the last second,” he says, “I called Eleanor, and she came up with this whole idea at midnight on the day of the deadline. So it’s essentially her idea.”

Friedman has good contacts with publishing agents, and his classes already had produced several book contracts. He hooked up Jones with a couple of agents, and one liked it, so he was soon on his way—to Vegas.

The first thing Thai wanted to do was interview Jeff’s parents, divorced and living on the West Coast. He had met his paternal grandparents before, but in Las Vegas, where Al was now living, they got closer. “We went out, played the slot machines, had buffets, and went home and talked politics,” Thai recalls fondly of his September stay in Vegas. He also was pleased with the pieces of family history he got from Jeff’s mother and father, but the other side of the family was trickier, as Eleanor’s parents both had been dead for some time—and they had kept most of their political activities secret, even from their daughter.

“I felt like I could do [the book] when I got the FBI files for Eleanor’s parents, about whom we knew almost nothing, just a little tidbit of family lore. A lot of that was really sketchy, but when I read hundreds and hundreds of pages of FBI files, I knew. . . that was the part I was most worried about, but in the end I had more documentation on that than almost anything else.”

Certain now that he could complete the project, Thai researched his subject intensively, though interviews, newspaper accounts—even weather reports from local newspapers on the day of a given event or meeting, so he could add that detail to his narrative. And he interviewed his parents extensively, but there were ground rules: “Our deal was that everything we told him would be the truth,” says Jeff, but that there were some things they wouldn’t talk about. For example, to this day, there are more than 20 bombings that no one has ever been charged with—because no one knows who actually put what where. And everybody from the Weather Underground community, despite all the bickering that broke them apart over the years, has remained tight-lipped. Jeff and Eleanor weren’t about to break that pattern.

Asked what else he has learned from the process, Thai blurts out, “Not to be too optimistic about the future of the left”—at which, for the first time during the interview, Jeff (though laughing) looks like he disagrees.

“I wouldn’t put it quite the same way, but . . .”

But Thai continues, citing a familiar pattern: national emergency followed by government repression followed by a period of apologizing. “You sort of feel frustrated,” he says, “because you see the same pattern happening over and over again, with no progression.”

Jeff Jones, 57, and Eleanor Stein, 58, have lived in Albany now for 18 and a half years. She is a professor at Albany Law School; he is communications director for Environmental Advocates of New York. Thai, 27, recently had been staying with his parents but has now rented a bungalow in Woodstock to work on his next book proposal. A graduate of Vassar and Columbia, Thai has been a clerk for the Albany Times Union and an intern and reporter for Newsday. (Thai’s younger brother, Arthur, also lives in Albany.)

At the front of Thai’s book is a brief, harrowing narrative of the night in 1981 when the feds stormed the family apartment in Manhattan (Thai was 4) to arrest his parents—effectively ending the fugitive part of their lives. Immediately, the reader focuses on how their radicalism might burden their own next generation.

Although Thai claims to remember the bust (Jeff and Eleanor did not end up getting sentenced to time in prison), he also says he knew relatively little of their past lives as a youth—except that he grew up in a sort of community of lefties, with their children, their stories, their traditions; he says he even “went to a Jewish Communist indoctrination summer camp.” And, he notes wryly, “there were always those picnics where they were passing around cigarettes . . .”

A self-described “armchair radical” who prefers the solitude of writing to any sort of group political activity, Thai clearly is on a different path the one taken by his parents. He also has a unique perspective on what he has learned about their radical days. “The hardest thing for me has always been, even now, picturing Jeff doing the things that he is famous for doing, in 1969,” Thai says. “I think Jeff is totally mellow and mild-mannered, but [he’s] famous for running up and jumping on stages, shoving people away from the microphone, and I cannot picture that. . . . I think it shows how unnatural is was for him, and all of them. The thing about the Weathermen is that it was a bunch of middle-class, white, young adults, who just felt totally uncomfortable with the idea of violence, but who felt they had to will themselves to do it.”

Somewhat surprisingly, Jeff agrees. “Yeah, I think that’s very insightful. I think back to some of the things I did, and just like him, I can hardly imagine doing them. The scariest thing I ever did was the first night of the demonstrations in Chicago in 1969, that became known as the Days of Rage, I led the crowd out of Lincoln Park and headed toward Judge [Julius] Hoffman’s house, and that’s where we had this tremendous battle with the police on the Near North Side of Chicago. To this day, that’s the scariest moment of my life, is those 15 minutes before, just saying, ‘Alright, I’m going to get up, I’m going to give this speech, and people are going to follow me out of this park. And who knows what’s gonna happen.’”

Thai: “They worked for months to gut-check themselves into doing that, and then they went, they threw some punches . . . and now, 30 years later, they’ll all tremble at the thought . . . and they’ll all apologize . . . and it just shows, how unnatural all of that was.”

Though Jeff Jones has always said he has never regretted the choices he made, he does acknowledge the toll those choices took on Al Jones. One of the central tensions of the book, says Thai, is Jeff and his father. “Because his father’s stance was all about being peaceful, and Jeff grew up a Quaker, but his moral compass put him to the opposite of that.”

Thanks to the book, Jeff accompanied Thai to Las Vegas for part of his interview, and got a rare chance to work through a lifetime of baggage. “We talked on levels about things that we had never talked about before—and that we probably never would have talked about if it wasn’t for this book,” Jeff says. “I’m aware that the choices that I made at that point in my life were very painful to my father, caused him lot of grief—he had to deal with a lot of things that he didn’t particularly want to deal with. . . . I was really glad when it was over and we had all survived and come out the other side, and put our lives back together. And we’ve become friends.”

Also, after the townhouse explosion, Jeff’s pacifist background crept back to the fore, and he was instrumental in pushing the Weathermen to keep the bombings low-impact—and no one else died in any of them. He says he believes his father takes some pride in that Jeff, at that time, pushed the Weathermen back from the brink of violence.

And Jeff, in turn, is taking great pride in his son’s accomplishment. “I’m proud of the job that he did, and I feel that he’s done a very honest appreciation of the history. . . . I think our relationship has strengthened through this process,” Jeff says. “I mean, what more could you ask for than to have your son interested in your history and willing to write about it—and not completely reject it or make fun of it? I get a real feeling of warmth and love from the book.

“The lesson that I’m learning right now,” he adds, “is what it means to have been part of making some history, and then watching the process by which future generations redefine that and turn it into something that has meaning to them. I don’t put a whole lot of my effort any longer into trying to defend the way I saw things at the time, or even the way I see things now. I’m much more interested in learning what has some relevance to people today.

“I’m proud to have met Eleanor and been part of these two families that have resisted a lot of the evils of our government over what turns out to be close to a century,” Jeff adds. “And I hope that stands for something people find some positives in.”

Thai adds that he hopes people his age read it, as it is the first take on this slice of history by someone of his generation.

And though he clearly is not subversive in the way his parents once were, Thai says he is very proud of his parents and grandparents and the commitment they made to what they believed in.

Asked if he ever wished they were more normal, Thai answers quickly: “If I had normal parents, I wouldn’t have a book.”

BACK TO TOP

 

Pataki Moves to Create Empire State Greenway by Developing 524-Mile WaterfrontGov.

By Al Baker

George E. Pataki offered a plan on Friday to transform the Erie Canal and the land along its shores into a waterfront greenway and link it with similar eco-friendly tracts to its east and west. The plan came months after the state Canal Corporation's deal to sell development rights along the canal was plagued by scandal.

At a news conference at a canal port in Little Falls, just west of Albany, Mr. Pataki said his plan to recast the 524-mile waterfront as a linear park dotted by tourist destinations, natural vistas and trails would unite the Hudson and Niagara greenways to form the Empire State Greenway, ''one of the largest greenways in the nation.''

Environmentalists quickly embraced the idea of ''water-dependent development'' along the canal. They said it would improve the struggling upstate economy through which the all-but-forsaken canal flows, and lure visitors with the promise of biking, hiking, boating and fishing amid the panoramic corridors of New York's interior.

''It would really link New York City to Buffalo,'' said John Stouffer, legislative director for the Atlantic chapter of the Sierra Club. ''Potentially, you could bike to Buffalo, or, if you were willing to brave the Hudson River, you could paddle to Buffalo.''

But hurdles remain before Mr. Pataki's vision can take root, Mr. Stouffer said, adding that he would watch closely to make sure that improving water quality, recreational activities and public access to the waterfront remained priorities over time.

In outlining his plan, the governor called for a grass-roots approach to greenway development. He nominated Carmella R. Mantello, the executive director of the Hudson River Valley Greenway Communities Council, to serve as director of the Canal Corporation, a subsidiary of the New York State Thruway Authority, which oversees the canal system.

If her appointment is approved by the corporation's board, Ms. Mantello will lead a task force of representatives from several state agencies and localities along the canal who would solicit suggestions from federal, state and local planners before sending recommendations to the governor within six months.

Those recommendations would ''form the basis'' of legislation that Mr. Pataki would submit to lawmakers in Albany next year to create the canal greenway, said Kevin C. Quinn, a spokesman for the governor.

Depending on what the task force recommends, parts of the development plan itself could also require state lawmakers' approval, state officials said.

An investigation by the state attorney general's office and the state inspector general's office found that the Canal Corporation's previous deal to sell development rights along the canal for $30,000 was fraught with favoritism and ethics violations.

While the Canal Corporation ''lost credibility'' in that affair, it is ''getting back on track,'' with the new plan, said Jeff Jones, a spokesman for Environmental Advocates of New York, a nonprofit group that monitors state government.

The gathering of grass-roots input from communities along the canal in advance of developers' proposals is a reversal of state policy, said Michael R. Fleischer, the executive director of the Thruway Authority.

Next, Mr. Jones said, the state should expand on the governor's plan by linking all of its canals and the St. Lawrence Seaway with its largest rivers. ''That would create a world class destination for eco-tourism that would rival the great waterways of Europe,'' he said.

BACK TO TOP

 

 
Son's book chronicles a radical family tree

By MARC HUMBERT

As the heavily armed FBI agents stormed into the apartment to arrest his parents, the 4-year-old walked to his bedroom and took his little scissors out of a drawer.

"The ends were rounded, and the blades were covered by blue plastic guards," Thai Jones recalled.

"I considered putting on the cowboy hat and charging into the hallway with scissors blazing to defeat these men who had come to hurt our family. Even then, I knew it was a battle against long odds. But I didn't realize it was a question that many in my family had already faced. They had chosen to fight.

"For me the decision was easy to make. I returned the scissors and closed the drawer. I went out to the hallway where my father was manacled, slid my small fingers around the cold cuffs into his palm, and stood with him in the corridor holding hands.

"This is my earliest memory," Jones writes of the scene on Oct. 23, 1981 that provides the poignant opening for "A Radical Line: From the Labor Movement to the Weather Underground, One Family's Century of Conscience."

What follows over the next 285 pages is the colorful history of his Weather Underground parents and activist grandparents.

Sitting next to a huge stone fireplace in the restored mill he is renting for the winter on the outskirts of Woodstock, the village immortalized by the '60s counterculture, Jones recently talked about mom and dad, then and now.

"For me, the hardest mental jump was imagining him doing the things that he's famous for. He was a wild man - climbing up on stages and grabbing microphones and pushing people off," the son said. "He's so mild-mannered."

An early leader of the Students for a Democratic Society, Jeff Jones helped give birth to the revolutionary Weather Underground movement. He led the charge onto the streets of Chicago in the infamous "Days of Rage" demonstration in October 1969.

It was at the beginning of the next year that Jeff Jones went underground, not to surface again publicly until the bust in the Bronx apartment.

During that time, Thai Jones' mother, Eleanor Stein, would leave his father after other Weather Underground leaders purged him for pushing a less violent agenda than they wanted. He favored blowing up objects, not people. She was pregnant with Thai at the time. The couple were apart for a year.

Thai did not learn of the separation until he started the book.

"I was never going to tell you that," his mother told him.

But she did. The book, after all, was her idea.

Thai, pursuing a master's degree at the Columbia School of Journalism, was taking a book-writing course and had a book proposal due.

"I called my mom in a panic and said do you have any book ideas and she said, to her utter dismay ever since, why don't you do the story of the grandparents because that's what makes it different than other '60s stories," he said.

"The next thing I knew, we had a book deal," the author said.

For his parents, there was pride, but also practical concern. There would be ground rules.

"We said we would answer all questions truthfully, not necessarily completely," the elder Jones said. "He would have to respect that there were areas we didn't want to talk about and mainly that would have to do with anything that could get anybody else in trouble."

The author readily agreed.

"My goal with the book is not to get my parents put in jail," he said.

The son also set some limits.

"I said, 'There's not going to be any sex in this book about the '60s. I'm going to put in as much rock 'n' roll, drugs and car chases as I can,"' he recalled.

While there are few details about the Weather Underground bombings and other illegal activity, the book contains plenty of tidbits that bring the parents and grandparents to life.

There is Jeff living on a houseboat in San Francisco Bay with Weather Underground icon Bernardine Dohrn - she sunbathed on the rooftop patio - and helping arrange for the 1970 prison escape of LSD-guru Timothy Leary.

Eleanor's parents were Communists. Arthur Stein was called twice before the House Committee on Un-American Activities. Annie Stein became a major figure in the civil rights movement and was active throughout the anti-Vietnam War movement.

Jeff's parents were Quakers and pacifists. Albert Jones spent World War II in a camp for conscientious objectors. Millie Jones ran off in 1967 with one of her adult violin students.

Jeff was a blond-haired California kid when he went east to Antioch College and two years later to New York City. Disillusioned by Lyndon Johnson's expansion of the Vietnam War and spurred on by the writings of Karl Marx and other revolutionaries, he was soon an SDS leader, a rebel with a cause - decked out in jeans, leather jacket and cowboy boots.

Eleanor Stein was the classic New York City kid - big hoop earrings, tall boots and short skirts. She embraced the anti-war movement during the Mark Rudd-led takeover at Columbia University in 1968 while a law student there. By the end of 1969, she had withdrawn from law school and left her first husband, Jonah Raskin, who later became a leader of the Yippies and an Abbie Hoffman biographer. Eleanor had also laid eyes on Jeff for the first time.

By 1971, the two had gotten to know each other while driving across America, were hiding out in the Catskills north of New York City and falling in love.

A decade later, the two would be arrested in their Bronx apartment. Both faced felony explosives possession charges and Jeff also had a misdemeanor riot count against him from the Days of Rage protests.

They worried what might happen to Thai while they were behind bars.

"I was expecting to go to jail for a couple of years," said the fugitive father.

A judge, however, sentenced Jeff to 18 months probation and six months of community service. All charges were dropped against Eleanor.

"The judge, I believe, saw us as a family that was coming out the other side of this political experience," Jeff recalled recently.

Thai, whose birth certificate had identified him as Ty Emerson, returned to his day-care center where he had been known as Timmy - life underground meant aliases, even for the kids. The teacher told the other children that Timmy was now Thai.

"None of the other four-year-olds found this odd," Thai wrote, "but several of them thought it would be fun to change their names."

Jeff drove the school bus for his son's day-care center for the six months community service, later got a job as a printer and then became a newspaper reporter. Eleanor went back to law school.

In 1986, the family of four - a second son, Arthur "Bluejay" Jones, was born in 1982 - moved to Albany. Mom had gotten a job as a clerk at the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest tribunal, and would later go on to a distinguished career with the state's Public Service Commission. She is now a professor at Albany Law School. Dad was a reporter covering state government for an alternative weekly newspaper and has since become the director of communications for Environmental Advocates, a lobbying group.

In late August, Thai joined thousands of others on the streets of New York City to protest the war in Iraq as the Republican National Convention began. Despite that, his father says he expects his son to follow a different road than the one traveled by the rest of the family.

"Thai very clearly wants to be a reporter, a historian and an observer, more than a participant," Jeff said recently as he sat in the ornate lobby of New York's state Senate in Albany. "And, as a parent, knowing perfectly well what I put my parents through, I would be delighted if that's the path Thai chooses."

It appears Thai has already made that choice.

"For one thing, it's impossible to be rebellious with parents who are literally icons of rebellion and revolution," he explained.

Looking back, Thai acknowledges his parents gave up a lot for a cause.

"For them, those were the most exciting years of their lives," he said. "So, personally, I don't think they were wasted (years). Politically, it's hard to point to any real significant achievements of the Weather Underground."

"I feel great joy in the book," the father said, "because even though he makes fun of us and he ultimately maybe doesn't agree that it was worth it, he respects it."

BACK TO TOP

 

 

Family memoir details radical life on the run

By Paul Grondahl

Jeff Jones is only half-joking when he says he's living a parent's worst nightmare.

His son grew up to be a writer and has published a book about the family's checkered past.

In what amounts to the first detailed public "outing" of his parents' involvement with the Weather Underground and 1960s militant activism, Thai Jones, 27, of Albany, has written his first book, "A Radical Line."

The nonfiction volume blends social history with family memoir. It chronicles three generations of leftist politics that grow strongly from both branches of his family tree. The story moves from his grandparents' work with the Communist Party in the 1950s, to his father's dozen arrests for inciting riots as a leader of Students for a Democratic Society and other radical acts, to his own childhood lived under an assumed name amid the turbulent undertow of his parents' maneuvers to avoid an FBI manhunt.

"My goal was never to get my parents thrown in jail," Thai says. He worked as an editorial assistant at the Times Union and Newsday before completing a master's degree at Columbia University's School of Journalism. He recently quit his job at Barnes & Noble bookstore in Colonie to travel around the country to promote his book.

His 57-year-old father, Jeff Jones, is a lobbyist and spokesman for Environmental Advocates of New York, based in Albany, and will accompany his son to some of the bookstore appearances on the West Coast.

Thai's mother, Eleanor Stein, 58, a professor at Albany Law School who specializes in telecommunications law, recently retired as administrative law judge with the state Public Service Commission.

Stein's radical adventures figure prominently in her son's book, but she avoids interviews and prefers to remain in the background during the book's promotion.

Paradoxically, the book was mom's idea. She answered a frantic, late-night call from Thai. He had procrastinated on an assignment to write a book proposal for a class at Columbia. Mom bailed him out by suggesting he write about their family's colorful political activism.

"And she's regretted it ever since," Thai said.

He's sitting at the antique table in his family's dining room in their book-crammed, comfortably unkempt Pine Hills bungalow. A '60s tapestry covers falling plaster from a roof leak. His mom's evocative landscape paintings brighten the walls. Outside, the shrubs and grass bear the shaggy, au naturel condition of an unrepentant environmentalist. The Jeep Cherokee in the driveway is the only jarring sight in the picture.

"Ohhhh, you're busted, dad," Thai said.

"Guilty. I can't justify it," his dad said. "I'm not a perfect environmentalist."

He argues that the 4-year-old Jeep is his fourth Cherokee and he's loyal to the brand. He points out that he and his wife share one vehicle as they have for the 18 years they've lived in Albany -- the longest stop in an itinerant life.

Listening to the father and son discuss and debate their perspectives on the Vietnam War, civil rights and political activism -- the father's from firsthand experience, with the scars to prove it, and the son's from interviews and books -- is like "Crossfire" meets "The Real World."

"The more I researched the Weather Underground, the more I saw you guys as cultish. I do poke fun at it sometimes," Thai said with a smirk. "I found it kind of laughable when you tried to transform yourselves from student activists in SDS to stone communist revolutionaries fighting for oppressed people the world over."

His dad countered: "We believed the world was in a time of revolution and we saw ourselves as true revolutionaries. Looking back on it now, we are who we are. We were middle-class, white suburban kids."

Early on in researching the book, Thai agreed to ground rules with his parents. They could decline to talk about certain incidents or people in the interviews, but anything they told him would be accurate. He also allowed his parents to read a draft of the manuscript and they consulted with a lawyer, who said the statute of limitations had run out on any criminal activities in which they might have been involved.

The publisher, Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, also reviewed the manuscript in their legal department. "Their main concern was that my parents would sue me for libel," Thai said. So far, that hasn't happened.

"I had some concerns at the outset, but I had no choice because Thai got an agent and a book contract on his own," his dad said. "Now that he's finished, I feel very proud as his father and think the book he's written is accurate and it doesn't de-legitimize what we did."

"A Radical Line" is marked by a straightforward, detached journalistic tone throughout. The son refers to his parents in the third-person and he has a crime reporter's style of sticking to the facts even when they involve his kin.

Such as his dad's bust in Hoboken, N.J., in 1979 for growing marijuana on the roof of their apartment building.

"I can't justify that, except to say I was very much a part of the hippie pot culture of that time and I found it liberating," his dad said. "I regret that we put Thai in harm's way when he was young. But I think we were good parents. We were transitioning from living underground to an above-ground existence when he was born."

The book project was an intense education for Thai, who wrote "A Radical Line" in his bedroom at his parent's house after moving back from Brooklyn. "I knew none of this history when I started," he said. "I'll never view my parents the same way again."

Thai's younger brother, Arthur, 22, whom the family calls "Bluejay," also recently moved back into his parent's home. He displaced his mom from her art studio. He works as a cook at Ground Round and plans to study history at the University at Albany.

"Talk about a parent's worst nightmare," the father said. "Both our sons are living back at home."

BACK TO TOP

 

 

Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded

By Daniel Wakin

When explosives accidentally demolished a Greenwich Village town house 33 years ago, three young militants inside were killed, leaving two of their comrades to stagger out and into clandestine life. All were members of the Weathermen, a violent offshoot of 1960's radicalism.

One of the survivors, Kathy Boudin, was granted parole last week for her role in a 1981 armored car robbery that left a Brink's guard and two police officers dead.

The Boudin case was a compelling reminder of a turbulent era. But the other woman who escaped serves as another reminder, of how a once revolutionary band has dispersed into the rhythms of quieter lives and more peaceful, but not always more remorseful, idealism.

The woman, Cathy Wilkerson, lives in Brooklyn. The mother of a grown daughter, she has spent the past two decades teaching mathematics in high schools and adult education programs.

Many former Weathermen have taken up careers that they see as an extension of their political commitment: teaching, social work and advocating causes like environmental protection, care for AIDS patients and prisoners' rights. Today they proclaim the same ideals they held four decades ago, and sharply condemn American policies at home and abroad.

"They sustain certain kinds of ideological and ethical commitments into their lives beyond the armed struggle," said Jeremy Varon, an assistant professor of history at Drew University in Madison, N.J.

Members of the Weathermen began resurfacing in the late 1970's after the group dissolved in 1976. Ms. Wilkerson emerged from hiding and surrendered to the authorities in 1980. She spent 11 months in jail on explosives charges in the explosion of the town house, on West 11th Street, which was owned by her father.

Now, she said, she is working on her memoirs, part of a new round of exploration of the Weather Underground, as it was later called by its leaders who found the original name sexist. Professor Varon is writing his own book about the group, which was the subject of "The Weather Underground," a well-received documentary film that opened in June.

In a telephone interview on Friday, Ms. Wilkerson said it was the first time she had spoken to a reporter in about 20 years.

"I'm re-entering the conversation," she said. "There are enormous problems that we predicted in the 60's, around the environment, about the wartime economy and permanent states of war, and there's a real crisis of leadership about those issues. Talking about patriotism is a way of distracting people as the world lumbers toward catastrophe."

Speaking in guarded tones, Ms. Wilkerson would not discuss the explosion, saying she wanted to save it for her book. But she did say that the Weather Underground's legacy of violence must be seen in the context of the times.

"We were way not the first," she said. "It was a mass phenomenon. In 1969, national liberation was sweeping the world and looked like it was going to be the main vehicle for ushering in popular governments. Now the wave of violence sweeping the world is reactionary."

Like other former members, she said the movement made "mistakes," adding, "We were all young, under 25 for the most part."

Conservative critics, including Prof. Harvey Klehr, the Andrew W. Mellon professor of politics and history at Emory University in Atlanta, have little patience for that view. "It would behoove people like that who did illegal, morally reprehensible things to have some sense of remorse," he said.

Professor Klehr also took a dim view of the often stated account that after the town house explosion, the Weathermen resolved to take no lives, and that in the string of bombings that followed, no one was seriously injured. He points out that members have said the explosives at the town house were intended for an officers' dance at Fort Dix in New Jersey and for Butler Library at Columbia University.

"The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence," he said. "I don't know what sort of defense that is."

The Weathermen -- who took their name from the Bob Dylan lyric "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows" -- originated as a faction of Students for a Democratic Society.

The leaders came from reasonably well-off families, though several interviewed said a common portrait of them as privileged children of the rich was a caricature. Charismatic and articulate, they employed revolutionary jargon, advocated armed struggle and black liberation and began bombing buildings, taking responsibility for at least 20 attacks. Estimates of their number ranged at times from several dozen to several hundred.

Their revolutionary language pursues them to this day, including the phrase attributed to Bill Ayers, a Weathermen founder, to "kill all the rich people." Then there were the words of Bernardine Dohrn, another founder, who seemed to delight in the Manson family murders before a Students for a Democratic Society crowd in 1969. (She has since said it was a joke.)

Mr. Ayers is distinguished professor of education at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Ms. Dohrn, his wife, teaches law at Northwestern University and is director of its Children and Family Justice Center. Together they raised Ms. Boudin's only child, her son, Chesa Boudin, who graduated from Yale in June and is a Rhodes scholar.

Mr. Ayers returned to the public eye two years ago with the publication of a book, "Fugitive Days," about his life as a Weatherman. And while they have been among the most outspoken members of the group, the couple would not be interviewed because, they said, they did not want to jeopardize Ms. Boudin's pending release. For the same reason, other former members also said they did not want to talk publicly, or limited their comments.

Four defendants in the Brink's case, two of them the former Weather Underground members Judith Clark and David J. Gilbert, are serving life prison terms with parole not scheduled for another half-century.

Another significant figure in the Weathermen was Jeff Jones, one of a group of Ms. Boudin's friends and supporters who lobbied for her parole. A former reporter for an alternative newspaper, he is now communications director for an environmental lobbying group in Albany. He said he felt "absolute horror at the idiocy" of the Bush administration. In Iraq, he said, the president "has gone down the path of Vietnam."

"We are now in a guerrilla war on foreign soil," Mr. Jones said.

Linda S. Evans, who was granted clemency by President Bill Clinton for convictions related to bombings and released from prison in 2001 after serving nearly 16 years, lives in Santa Rosa, Calif. She received a Soros criminal justice fellowship from the Open Society Institute and works to restore civil rights to felons. "I'm trying to make things better in our society," she said in a telephone interview. "I just feel really strongly that the policies of our government are just anti-human at every level."

Mark Rudd, the Students for a Democratic Society leader from Columbia, teaches mathematics at the Albuquerque Technical Vocational Institute, a community college. He, too, has called the group's violence a "terrible mistake."

An early organizer, Jonathan Lerner, wrote an article for The Washington Post Magazine last year about his Weathermen days in which he denounced the group as a "cult of leftist cynicism and violence" whose members amounted to "political terrorists."

For most Weathermen, he wrote in the article, "the legal consequences were negligible."

"We came to in a daze," he wrote. "We crawled off to lick our wounds, learn to be responsible grown-ups -- hard work, for the inexperienced -- and come to terms with what we had done."

Brian Flanagan, who was acquitted of assault and attempted murder charges stemming from the 1969 "Days of Rage" violence that surrounded the Chicago Eight trial, owns a bar, the Night Cafe on the Upper West Side, which was the setting for several interviews filmed for the recent documentary "The Weather Underground," which was directed by Sam Green and Bill Siegel.

The film revived contacts among former members, Mr. Flanagan said, and prompted him and others to open up about the past in interviews and public forums. He said he recently met up with Ms. Wilkerson in the bar, which has become what he called "definitely a lefty bar."

"There were a lot of things I had trouble coming to terms with over the years, and this has resurrected them," Mr. Flanagan said of the documentary which, he said, portrayed him as more rueful than he felt.

"I was regretful over about 5 percent of what we did," he said. "I think 95 percent of what we did was great, and we'd do it again."

And what was the 5 percent? The town house, Mr. Flanagan said. When pressed, he said he regretted both the deaths of the three Weathermen -- Ted Gold, Diana Oughton and Terry Robbins -- and the plan to bomb the dance at Fort Dix and the library at Columbia, which could have taken lives.

And life outside politics? "I run my business," he said. "I shoot pool, I drink wine. I'm old and fat." He also mentioned winning $23,000 as a contestant on "Jeopardy!"

"God bless America," Mr. Flanagan said.

BACK TO TOP

 

Another century finds more waterways passable to the public

By Michael Virtanen

The Schroon River winds for miles through private land on its way down into the lake, but the divide between Adirondack property owners and paddlers stands in high relief at the put-in.

The state canoe access site off Route 74 - a parking area with narrow wooden steps to the river - is surrounded by signs that say Private. The adjacent land is posted against trespassing.

"You actually have the right of way when you're on the water," said Bruce Robinson, who rents canoes at Maypine Marine. But, he added, you may not be able to get out and walk around on somebody's property.

It's a thumbnail description of the current state of riparian rights, an old issue in the Adirondacks, with as many twists as the Schroon.

Ten years ago, five paddlers set out to clarify those rights. The result was nine years of litigation, a decision from New York's highest court affirming rights of recreational canoeists and a settlement with a major landowner. Today, more of the state's rivers are open to the public.

"The practical value of the case is really what everybody is crowing about," says Tom Kligerman, organizer of the June 15, 1991, canoe trip. He and four companions paddled 21 miles that day, 12 through land owned and posted by the Adirondack League Club.

"Of course they claim they won. Both sides claim they won," says Mart Allen, a former state forest ranger who was general manager of the private fishing and hunting club at the time.

Paddlers still have no right to cross private land to reach a river, to fish where the river passes through private land, or to camp alongside it, Allen said. In a settlement with the 50,000-acre club, paddlers can traverse the South Branch of the Moose River only from May 1 to Oct. 15, and when the water is 2.65 feet or higher.

The Adirondack League Club was started in 1878, and its roughly 380 members pay taxes and dues, Allen said. "It's not cheap. ... It (the court decision) diminished their rights of being an exclusive club. It was a taking, as far as I'm concerned, without compensation."

Allen, who was made a life member of the club on retirement in 1992, said the canoeists came specifically to provoke a confrontation, which mainly amounted to Allen asking if they knew they were on private land, asking them to leave and asking their names.

Shortly after that, the two canoes flipped in Grindstone Rapids, within view of a small crowd of hunt club staff and members.

Kligerman, a state Transportation Department engineer in Albany, headed the Adirondack Committee of the state chapter of the Sierra Club. With him went Carl Anderson and Lorraine Van Hatten, canoeists from the Utica area, journalist Jeff Jones, and Bob Wolff, a river guide.

The four canoeists quickly righted their boats. Wolff, in a kayak, retrieved paddles, and they continued through Adirondack League Club property, later portaging around the 12-foot drop at Limekiln Falls, reaching state land again in late afternoon.

"We expected them to do something. We had no idea we would be sued for $5 million," Van Hatten says. "That sort of threw us for a loop."

Nancy Jones, a Troy attorney and paddler, defended them pro bono. The Adirondack Mountain Club and the state attorney general's office intervened on their side.

Also in the boats was the influence of Paul Jamieson, author of the 1975 book "Adirondack Canoe Waters - North Flow." Years earlier, Kligerman had gone on outings with Jamieson.

In Jamieson's view, all Adirondack waterways were publicly accessible a century earlier. But in the late 1800s, the wealthy bought large estates and posted boundaries against trespassing, blocking river access.

The government was enlisted to enforce claims to privacy. Allen said canoeists indeed had been arrested and successfully prosecuted for trespassing at the Adirondack League Club.

But in 1990 and 1991, the state Department of Environmental Conservation sent a memo to rangers and police agencies, advising them to stop making such arrests.

That memo followed a 1988 law review article by John Humbach, Pace University associate dean of property law. The research on New York cases was done at the request of Charles Morrison, DEC director of land resources. It concluded that streams deemed navigable in fact are open as public highways, regardless of who owns the riverbed or banks.

Even then, Kligerman said, 20 rivers in the Adirondack Park remained effectively closed by landowner postings. Meetings were held at the DEC with interested groups on how to clarify the right of navigation, he says, but attempts to get a bill through the state Legislature were fruitless. He decided to test the waters, expecting some sort of criminal court case.

By the end of the civil case that actually followed, the damages claim against the five paddlers and the Sierra Club had been dismissed. A 1998 ruling from the state's top court, the Court of Appeals, noted "the right to portage on riparian lands."

Jamieson, in his 90s, wrote to Kligerman that the state's purchase of Champion land and easements meanwhile liberated "the most-hoped-for rivers" of his cherished north flow, including the South Branch of the Grass River and the Middle Branch of the St. Regis, leaving access to only a few waterways blocked by private owners.

Soon after the final settlement with the Adirondack League Club, the "Moose River five" went back in July 2000. On a weekday after a heavy rain, it took 10 hours instead of 12, they didn't see anyone else, and they knew what to expect from the rapids.

"It was," Van Hatten said, "definitely easier."

BACK TO TOP