| |
|
Latest News
Jeff Jones is a regular contributor to The Green Blog, hosted by the Albany Times Union. He posts regularly on environment, clean energy and green jobs issues. Read the blog at http://blogs.timesunion.com/green/.
May 2009
Green Jobs TV Spot, Albany Times Union
March 30, 2009
Budget deal restores New York environmental funding, silive.com / Associated Press
March 29, 2009
Green jobs and the bottom line, Albany Times Union
March 3, 2009
NY poised to create green-collar workforce, New York Teacher
February 5, 2009
Jeff Jones named one of The 10 best regional writers, poets and journalists of the past 30 years, Metroland
January 28, 2009
Report to detail, address coastal pollution in NY, Associated Press
September 21, 2008
Regulatory Maze Creates Sustainable Energy Gridlock: Local governments undermine New York’s green energy goals, Network for New Energy Choices press release (Read the related Newsday article)
June 5, 2008
Lives spent on front line of history, Albany Times Union article
May 29, 2007
Act on brownfields, Albany Times Union editorial
May 4, 2007
Let's clean 'em up: Adjustments to the 2003 brownfields law will help fulfill its promise, Newsday Editorial
April 10, 2007
The following flyer was developed by peace and environmental activists in Fort Green, Brooklyn based on the politics of War and Warming (see No War for Oil/No Oil for War). It was designed to be used at local Step It Up activities on April 14th, and beyond. There is no sense of ownership here. Feel free to adapt and use this for future peace and environmental events.
Download the flyer: MS Word | PDF
March 7, 2007
Local anti-war activist Erin O'Brien says of this recent posting to MRZine.org by Jeff Jones and Eleanor Stein: "Eleanor Stein and Jeff Jones have written an important article about
connecting the peace and antiwar crowd with the environmentalist
movement. We all know that the war in iraq is a war for oil, and we
often lament our consumption of petroleum products, but this article
provides detailed analysis of what it would mean to really have a
broad-based movement demanding No War for Oil, No Oil for War.
Eleanor and Jeff provide compelling evidence of our society's
overconsumption of fossil fuels, the media's success in downplaying
the realities and consequences, and hope for how we can move forward
to take back our nation's priorities. That's one of the most
important aspects of this piece, I believe. It's one thing to talk
about the problem, we hear an awful lot about what's wrong. It's
another to offer insight into how we can reclaim our lives and our
futures, and still have hope despite the great obstacles in our way." Read the full article, No War for Oil, No Oil for War.
Albany Times Union, July 18,
2006: Coalition Pushes Cleaner Future in New York; Labor, Environmentalists
Form Apollo Alliance to Encourage Alternative Energy, "Green Collar" Jobs.
Monthly Review, June 6, 2006:
Stirring the Pot, Remembering Stew Albert -- 1939-2006. By Jeff Jones.
Legislative Gazette, March 13, 2006: Environmentalists Want More for Water
Protection.
Schenectady Gazette, Feb. 19, 2006:
Jeff Jones appears on Environmental Justice Panel.
New Haven Advocate, Feb. 9, 2006: Mr.
Tambourine Man, Remembering the Legendary Yippie, Stew Albert (1939-2006).
Legislative Gazette, Jan. 30, 2006:
Environmentalists Thank New York Governor, George Pataki.
Adirondack
Explorer, Jan/Feb, 2006: 4 Shades of Green, Park's Defenders Differ in
Approach
Albany
Times Union, Jan. 4, 2006: Checking in With Lobbyists
The New
York Times, Jan. 1, 2006: An Ocean Agenda For New York
Newsday, Dec.
29, 2005: Save our Lakes, Ocean: Gov. Pataki, in State of State, Should
Outline Ocean Stewardship Policy.
Gotham Gazette, Dec. 12, 2005:
The Need for Healthier Schools.
Environmental Advocates Board of
Directors Praises the Work of Jeff Jones -December 5, 2005
Jeff Jones Leaves
Environmental Advocates
New York
Times, May 28, 2005:
Pataki Moves to Create Empire State Greenway
by Developing 524-Mile Waterfront
Associated
Press, Dec. 24, 2004: Book chronicles a radical family tree
Metroland Magazine, Nov. 18,
2004: Book chronicles two generations of family radicalism
Times Union, Oct. 7, 2004:
Family memoir details radical life on the run
New York Times,
Aug. 24, 2004: Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs
Hasn't Faded
Associated Press, Oct. 13, 2001:
Another century finds more waterways passable to the public
Lives spent on front line of history
By Jeff Jones, first published June 5, 2008, Times Union
Dramatic, moving moments of history provide certain markers in a lifetime. An early memory involves my parents waking me up in 1952 (I was 5) to tell me that Adlai Stevenson had won the Democratic Party nomination for President. I vividly recall sitting in my high school Spanish class in 1963 when word came that John F. Kennedy had been killed in Dallas.
Capital Communications Federal Credit Union
The year 1968 provided more than its share of such memories. Two months and a day before Robert Kennedy was shot in Los Angeles, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was gunned down in Memphis. These, along with the student uprising at Columbia University and the protests outside the Democratic convention in Chicago provide images still vivid 40 years later.
On the evening of the day King was killed, I roamed Times Square, watching the police lose control of the streets and the start of a night of looting. In the days following that national trauma, riots occurred in 125 U.S. cities. In Washington, fires reached within six blocks of the White House. Machine guns were mounted on the lawn and on the balcony of the Capitol. Nationwide, 46 people were killed, 2,500 injured, and 70,000 troops -- Army and National Guard -- augmented local police forces to restore order.
Less than three weeks later, at Columbia University, I climbed in a back window and joined several thousand striking students occupying five buildings. We were protesting the school's planned taking of public land in Harlem's Morningside Park for a Jim Crow-style gymnasium and a secret military research projects that made it complicit in the Vietnam War. After eight days, when the police retook the campus, I was one of 1,100 students and community members arrested. I avoided arrest in Chicago in August. My girlfriend, high heels and all, and I outran a cop late one night. On another evening, we ducked down an alley as police bullets were flying. But, when the Democratic Party handed the nomination to Hubert Humphrey over Eugene McCarthy, and the blood flowed in the streets outside, we stood there chanting, "The Whole World is Watching!" And it was.
My memory of Robert Kennedy's assassination is less precise. I was barely 21 and already alienated from the national political process, freshly arrested at Columbia and getting ready for Chicago. Like many, I was becoming numb to the violence, wrung out and without faith that anything good would come from working within the system.
RFK's murder was more evidence that something was terribly wrong with America, that the system in place would not change. That year, more than 14,500 Americans would be killed fighting in Vietnam, along with countless Vietnamese. The assassination of Robert Kennedy, who I believed was an opponent of the Vietnam War, and Humphrey's pro-war triumph over McCarthy, steeled my resolve to work outside the system.
I concluded then that real progress would only happen under pressure from movements and organizations independent of the dominant political parties. To this day, I look first to the peace, justice and environmental movements for guidance and hope.
Jeff Jones is a consultant and lobbyist in Albany, working mainly on environmental issues.
Act on Brownfields
First published May 29, 2007, Times Union
New York's landmark 2003 brownfield law is flawed and needs fixing. It also happens to be a textbook example of what can go wrong when negotiations are held in the middle of the night, rather than in public, as Governor Spitzer now insists, as he and legislative leaders try to reach agreement on pending issues.
The law was rushed through during one of the Legislature's infamous marathon sessions, albeit with the best of intentions. Lawmakers had hoped to spur development of contaminated sites, mostly in urban areas and upstate, by offering developers generous tax incentives to build there.
But it didn't take long before the flaws were exposed. Tax credits of up to 22 percent were pegged not only to a developer's cost of cleaning up a contaminated site, but also to the cost of construction itself. That meant big developers in Manhattan could save millions of dollars even if their cleanup costs were relatively modest. A case in point: The firm behind the New York Times Tower in midtown Manhattan applied for $170 million in tax credits for the $850 million project, even though cleanup costs were less than $1 million.
When the loophole was exposed, embarrassed state officials moved to rewrite the rules and disqualify the Times project. But they also tightened rules to a point that discouraged smaller development projects that could have large community benefits, such as affordable housing. And the overall goal of the credit program, to clean up thousands of contaminated sites statewide, remains elusive. So far, only 25 projects have been approved, with another 148 applications under review.
All this could change for the better, however, if Governor Spitzer and legislative leaders add brownfield reform to their priority list for the end of this year's regular session. As it happens, there is a blueprint for just such reform in a new report by the New Partnership for Community Revitalization, a not-for-profit organization of banks, community groups, builders and environmentalists. The group wisely suggests that the tax credit program be targeted at areas plagued with poverty, crime or dwindling population. Just as important, the report recommends separate tax credits for clean-ups and redevelopment.
Many brownfield sites are in urban areas that, sadly, fit the group's criteria all too well, which is why most lenders today will not finance any redevelopment there. But a tax credit program properly targeted to areas most in need of revitalization could lure the financing needed to get things done. First, though, Mr. Spitzer, Senate Majority Leader Joseph Bruno and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver must act -- and soon.
Let's clean 'em up
Adjustments to the 2003 brownfields law will help fulfill its promise
May 4, 2007
It took years of negotiation to craft the 2003 state brownfields law, which was designed to help turn contaminated, unproductive land and buildings into clean developments that pay taxes and help the community. But almost four years later, that law needs tweaking.
One of the law's sections, the brownfield cleanup program, offers tax credits to firms that clean up the sites, once the Department of Environmental Conservation certifies that the cleanup is satisfactory. But as the program unfolded, the state looked at the potential dimensions of these tax credits and realized that they could cost New York a bundle. So, the state has tightened the rules, which reduces its liability but also slows down the pace of greening up thousands of brownfields.
Another major approach to brownfields is more innovative: The brownfield opportunity area program is designed to draw in citizens and developers to clean up entire neighborhoods. That makes sense. If someone cleans up one contaminated site, but others nearby remain unchanged, that doesn't help the community.
As sound as the concept is, the execution has lagged. For one thing, the opportunity area programs have required a memorandum of understanding between the legislature and the governor. These take forever to obtain and slow things down.
Luckily, the new budget seems to have eliminated the language that requires these memoranda in the future. Next, the legislature needs to put up financial incentives to draw developers into the brownfield opportunity area program. It should link the tax credits already in the law to the opportunity area program - and fix all the other defects in an immensely promising law that has not worked well yet.
Copyright 2007 Newsday Inc.
Coalition pushes cleaner future in New York
Labor, environmentalists
form Apollo Alliance to encourage alternative energy, "green collar" jobs
By
LARRY RULISON, Business writer
First published: Tuesday, July 18,
2006
ALBANY -- A collection of business,
labor and environmental groups has come together to promote clean-energy
technology and construction projects in the state.
The New York State Apollo Alliance was
launched Monday at a news conference at the Legislative Office Building in
Albany. Its members include the Environmental Business Association of New
York State, the Sierra Club, United Steelworkers and New York State United
Teachers, among others.
Officials from the groups pointed to
countries like Japan and Germany as leaders in the use and development of
renewable-energy technologies such as solar power. They said New York can
aspire to be more like those nations by investing heavily in the sector.
"It generates lots of opportunities,"
said Ira Rubenstein, executive director of the Environmental Business
Association of New York State, a trade group based in Albany. "They've been
focused on their policy for 20 years, and it pays."
The new group is affiliated with the
Apollo Alliance, a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C. The New York group is
the 11th state chapter to be created.
Alternative energy has been a huge
focus of political and business leaders in the Capital Region. Gov. George
Pataki and the Legislature have supported alternative-energy projects and
business development in the state, and local universities -- including the
University at Albany and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute -- already have
major alternative-energy research and development programs in place.
The region also is home to emerging
alternative-energy companies like DayStar Technologies Inc. of Halfmoon,
which makes solar cells; Plug Power Inc. and MTI MicroFuel Cells Inc., two
Colonie companies that make fuel cells; and SuperPower Inc., a Schenectady
company that is developing superconducting wire for the utility and defense
industries. GE Wind, General Electric Co.'s wind power operation, also is
headquartered in Schenectady.
But Jeff Jones, project director for
New York Apollo, who also is a consultant to the Workforce Development
Institute in Albany, said the group's creation was important because it
brought together labor and environmental interests. Jones called it a
"blue-green" alliance.
"It's a unique coalition," he said.
The group has developed a 10-point plan
that it also unveiled Monday. It asked political candidates to embrace its
causes, but said it would not endorse any candidates.
The plan calls for the construction and
retrofitting of buildings and schools that use less energy and have
healthier environments.
It also calls for the creation of
thousands of "green collar" jobs through the promotion of research and
development and manufacturing in the alternative-energy sector. New
incentives could be created by investments from state and local pension
funds, and the business community would be encouraged to invest in these new
technologies. The group estimates that at least 20,000 new manufacturing
jobs could be created this way.
The plan also calls for the expansion
of urban spaces and promotion of bike- and pedestrian-friendly communities.
And it encourages development of mass-transit networks such as light rail
with a reduction in waste and an increase in recycling.
William Pienta, district director of
United Steelworkers District 4 in Cheektowaga, near Buffalo, said New York
could benefit from additional wind turbine manufacturing. He pointed to
Pennsylvania, which attracted Spanish wind-turbine manufacturer Gamesa Corp.
to build a manufacturing and regional headquarters.
"This is a major industry that can go
anywhere," Pienta said. "I want some of that in New York state."
Rulison can be reached at 454-5504 or
by e-mail at lrulison@timesunion.com.
Positive outlook
A study completed by The Perryman
Group, an economic consultant in Waco, Texas, found that the Apollo
Alliance's New York efforts could create: $15.1 billion in economic activity
$9.6 billion in increased income 228,100 new jobs, including:
31,320 new manufacturing jobs
25,635 new construction jobs
BACK TO TOP
BACK TO TOP
BACK TO TOP
Mr. Tambourine Man, Remembering
the Legendary Yippie, Stew Albert (1939-2006).
By Jeff Jones
Stew Albert had one of
his smart, funny ideas when he was thinking about a name for his memoir. My
Sixties, he said was going to call it. He was in his late fifties when we
kicked this one around and I thought the irony was sublime: He knew the book
wouldn’t be out until he had turned the numerical corner.
Stew didn't call his book
My Sixties—the title is still out there, if someone with a lifetime of
movement cred wants to grab it. Instead, he called it Who The Hell is Stew
Albert?
Who indeed?
The title is a quote from
Howard Stern, who once responded with that question when one of his on-air
gang started talking about Stew as if everyone in the world knew who he was.
Stern didn’t, but that was his loss: It always seemed to me that Stew knew
everyone and everyone knew Stew.
Nobody was more devoted
to the idea of the Sixties. If you want to see what I mean, visit his
website (http://members.aol.com/stewa/stew.html).
Stew worked hard to translate Sixties values to a new generation of
political activists. He kept in touch with a wide array of movement
veterans, loyal and engaged, blogging his thoughts and poems every day—right
up until his penultimate day.
Younger activists adored
him.
He died January 30th.
Stew was big and
barrel-chested, with curly blond hair and piercing blue eyes. Losing Stew—he
was 66 when he fell to liver cancer—creates a huge personal, political and
emotional hole for me, as I know it does for so many others, especially his
wife, Judy “Gumbo” Clavir Albert, and his daughter, Jessica Pearl. The
Albert’s post-1960s peregrinations—Bay Area, Hudson Valley, back to the West
Coast—finally landed them in Portland, Ore. Years of fighting various
ailments kept Stew close to home, and close to his computer where he became
the most successful sixties radical I know at moving to online activism.
Whenever we met, we spent hours catching up on the latest gossip about the
doings of various old Panthers, Yippies and Weathermen. And then we would
plot and scheme, mostly about how to support those emerging young activists
devoted to resistance to racism, environmental catastrophe and Bush’s oil
wars.
How I met Stew says
something about who he was. That is, I don’t remember how I met him. I
remember the first time I met the other Yippie founders: Abbie Hoffman,
Jerry Rubin and Paul Krassner. But Stew just appeared in my life one day,
and he never left.
To one degree or another,
the founding Yippies were all nuts. It was their strength, their weakness,
their charisma and their charm (for Abbie, in particular, it was also his
doom).
Stew was different. He
always had a strategy and a plan. He managed the campaign of Pigasus the Pig
for president in 1968 and ran for sheriff of Alameda County in 1970 (He
lost, but carried the city of Berkeley). More than anyone, he helped Abbie
and Jerry give definition to the Yippie movement. Without his ability to
broker their competitive egos and channel their ideas into strategy, what is
passing into history as the Yippie story would have been different,
definitely diminished and possibly disregarded.
The Sixties were filled
with political tendencies: anarchism, communism, socialism, the working
class, armed revolution, Panthers, Weathermen, Maoism. It wasn’t easy to
find one’s way and keep one’s head. (The lineup may be different today, but
it’s not any easier.) In this political stew, Stew Albert was a cultural
radical with a political ideology. We bonded because I was a political
radical struggling to blend New Left ideology with the cultural power of
young people. We found ourselves speaking the same language, and stayed
friends to the end.
Along the way we had some
adventures. When the Weathermen helped Timothy Leary escape from a
California prison and make his way to an uncertain reception at Eldridge
Cleaver’s expatriot compound in Algeria, Stew went over to help with the
introduction.
Long before today’s
wiretaps, Stew and Judy were being watched and tailed by the FBI. After the
Weather Underground bombed the U.S. Capitol in 1971 to protest the Vietnam
War, they famously declared: “We didn’t do it, but we dug it.”
We last spoke on New
Year’s day. That was just after his email arrived letting his many friends
know that doctors had just found the cancer and that it was bad. His daily
blog told the unfolding story of his fading hopes for a cure, his joyful, if
tiring, visits with friends. Daughter Jessica came home from law school to
be with him, and his happiness grew having her near. Two days before the
end, he blogged to the world that “my politics have not changed.” No death-
bed conversions or regrets for a life lived radically and well, in constant
resistance to a government and political system he abhorred. As Stew slipped
away, he posted his final words: “It’s still me. It’s still me.” n
BACK TO TOP
4 Shades of Green -
Adirondack Explorer
Park's defenders differ in
approach
By Phil Brown
The Adirondack Club
and Resort could be the biggest development in the history of the Adirondack
Park: It calls for more than 700 condominiums, single-family homes and
“Great Camps” to be built on 6,400 acres on the outskirts of the village of
Tupper Lake.
Supporters say the
project—which also calls for reopening the Big Tupper Ski Area—would turn
around the economy of a village that has been down on its luck for years.
But opponents say the development would set a bad example for the rest of
the Park.
So where do the Park’s environmental watchdogs stand?
• The Association for the Protection of the Adirondacks has taken a stand
against the project. David Gibson, the executive director, calls such a huge
development “fundamentally wrong for the Adirondack Park.”
• The Residents’ Committee to Protect the Adirondacks wants the state to buy
3,000 acres of the land eyed by the developers—as well as adjacent lands—and
create a 20,000-acre Wilderness Area.
• The Adirondack Council is suggesting that the Olympic Regional Development
Authority take over the Big Tupper Ski Area and that the state preserve as
much of the surrounding land as possible.
• The Adirondack Mountain Club has several worries, such as that the influx
of seasonal residents may lead to the overuse of nearby Forest Preserve
tracts, but the club is waiting for the developer to submit a final
application before adopting an official position.
The four groups by and large share the same concerns over the project
(including forest fragmentation and scenic blight).
Nevertheless, their divergent positions reflect both the strength and
weakness of the environmental movement in the Adirondacks. On the one hand,
the multiplicity of perspectives fosters a lively public debate and makes it
less likely that a good idea gets overlooked. On the other hand, the groups
probably wield more clout when they speak with one voice.
The question is whether the environmental groups strike the proper balance
between independence and cooperation. And the answer will depend on the
issue—and on where the person answering stands on that issue.
In general, though, most green-minded observers argue that the advantages of
having several organizations fighting for the Park outweigh the
disadvantages caused by their failure to agree or work together on every
matter.
Jeff Jones, a political consultant in Albany who used to work for
Environmental Advocates, a statewide organization, said politicians at the
state Capitol may never set foot in the Adirondacks, but they get the
message that it’s a special place by virtue of the fact that so many people
lobby on its behalf.
Jones is one who sees the groups’ differences as more of a plus than a
minus. “You could take all the resources and put them into one great, big
organization, but then you’d lack the diversity,” he said. “It’s good to
have the tension and disagreements fought out in public rather than kept
inside a boardroom.”
BACK TO TOP
|
Taking An Interest
Times Union, Jan. 4, 2006
The Times Union checked in with a number of
lobbyists and interest groups for various issues to see what they expect
from Gov. George Pataki's final State of the State address this
afternoon, and will touch base with them after the speech to see if it
lived up to, surpassed or failed to meet their expectations.
"We expect him to talk again about the need to reduce the nation's
highest tax burden. We expect to hear about workers' compensation costs.
We hope to hear about the need to reduce energy costs ... Will his
potential political ambitions motivate what he says or how he says it? I
don't know, and I'm not sure it's knowable. Frankly, we're more
interested in what he proposes and what gets done than any motivation
external to the issue.'' Matthew Maguire, spokesman, Business Council of
New York State
"I think we're going to see a national campaign speech. He's going to be
moving to the right, talking about tax cuts, reducing crime and Medicaid
reform. I expect to see all these things. This is a governor who is
running for president, there's a tremendous amount of overlap between
his fiscal conservative agenda and our agenda of the wise use of tax
dollars ... I am cautiously optimistic that he'll talk about the waste
of contracting out.'' Roger Benson, president, New York State Public
Employees Federation
"After vetoing the unintended pregnancy prevention act last year, the
governor said he would work to expand access to emergency contraception.
We expect him to honor that commitment to the women of New York.'' JoAnn
M. Smith, president and CEO of Family Planning Advocates of New York
"Our top agenda item is sex education, but we haven't heard any
commitments on that yet from the governor's office, whereas he's made a
commitment to the emergency contraception issue. (Will he mention it?)
We hope that he will.'' Susan Pedo, FPA, director of public affairs and
communications
"I would expect a hard core Republican message like the one he started
out with: Crime, welfare and taxes ... If he is running for president, I
expect some red meat for the conservative base ... I'd love to hear him
talk about serving the most vulnerable people with Medicaid cards in
their pockets, but I expect if Medicaid is mentioned, it will would be
more as a source for budget cuts.'' Michael Kink, lobbyist
"We are hopeful that the governor's going to announce an increase in
spending in the environmental protection fund; we've been trying to get
it up to 2 cents on the dollar for the last couple of years. Last year,
there was a $25 million increase to $150 million, and this year, we are
looking forward to another increase. I think that will help the governor
achieve some of the legacy goals that he is setting for his last year in
office.'' Jeff Jones, environmental lobbyist
"I'm hoping that he'll say that in better times, which I believe this
is, the state will pay long-overdue attention to hard-pressed community
providers who haven't seen increases of any note in a decade. I'm hoping
that he will push for a civil confinement legislation that will house
sex offenders in correctional facilities not mental health facilities.
... I'm hoping, and have reason to believe, that he may be looking to
shore up the safety net by giving increases to providers who each day
keep people who have serious psychiatric problems out of hospitals,
homeless shelters, prisons, jails and emergency rooms.'' Harvey
Rosenthal, executive director, New York Association of Psychiatric
Rehabilitation Services
"The State of the State is typically more about the state of the
governor and what image he's playing to the public. I expect this will
be more his attempt to write the first draft of history's review of his
tenure. We will be looking for whether he will use this opportunity to
push for reform. ... The big question really is: Will the governor see
his audience as a national audience or just a state one? I don't know if
we're going to be able to tell from the State of the State.'' Blair
Horner, lobbyist, New York Public Interest Research Group
"The challenge for him is: How do you unveil any kind of exciting new
agenda, assuming he even has one, when you're a lame duck? ... The first
State of the State is always the one that has impact, because a new
governor is somebody who is perceived to have a following wind and a
mandate. He arrives in a honeymoon period and has everybody listening to
him. When you're in your 12th year, and everybody has pretty much
decided they know exactly what you're about and are counting the hours
until you're gone, it's difficult.'' E.J. McMahon, director of the
Empire Center of the Manhattan Institute
BACK TO TOP
|
An Ocean Agenda for New York
New York Times
Editorial, January 1, 2006
It's no secret that the oceans are
under siege. In recent years, two major commissions - the
Congressionally established United States Commission on Ocean Policy and
the independent Pew Oceans Commission - have urged prompt action to end
overfishing of commercially valuable species, reduce pollution from
cities and farms, restore wetlands and control development along the
coasts. Obviously, a problem of this magnitude requires intervention by
Washington and even international organizations, but the states - which control
waters up to three miles offshore - also have important roles to play.
With that in mind, some states,
notably California, have recently strengthened their laws and overhauled
the way they manage ocean resources. Now a coalition of environmental
groups is urging Gov. George Pataki to do the same.
Over the years, New York has done
much to protect its marine assets - its 1,850 miles of tidal shoreline,
its many beaches and its rich assortment of distinct coastal
environments, notably the South Shore of Long Island, Long Island Sound
and the Hudson River estuary. But the challenges keep growing.
Nearly 40 percent of coastal waters
fail to meet either state or federal water quality standards, catches
for big commercial fish species have declined, and in some areas
shellfish stocks have crashed. The yield in Great South Bay, once one of
the most productive clamming areas along the East Coast, is a mere 2
percent of what it was in 1976.
There are any number of sensible
steps that can be taken. The most obvious is to improve coordination and
accountability among the many agencies with jurisdiction over marine
resources. This could be done by executive order or, as California did,
with legislation conferring power on an interagency council to help set
policy and coordinate action on the entire range of ocean-related
issues, from upgrading sewage treatment to preserving wetlands to
curbing coastal sprawl.
Meanwhile, state laws could be
strengthened to help end overfishing. Protected zones for shellfish
could be established until their populations recover. The governor could
use his influence to broaden the range of candidates nominated to the
industry-dominated regional councils that determine catch limits, adding
more scientists and conservationists to the mix. An increase in the
state's Environmental Protection Fund would strengthen research and
improve law enforcement.
All this may require some knocking
together of heads in Albany. But legislators like Long Island's Thomas
DiNapoli, the chairman of the Standing Committee on Environmental
Conservation, stand ready to help move things forward.
The issue would seem a natural for
Mr. Pataki. He cares about conservation and he knows something about
marine issues, having served on the Pew Commission. Adding the oceans to
his to-do list could only enhance his environmental legacy.
BACK TO TOP
|
|
Save our Lakes, Ocean: Gov. Pataki, in
State of State, Should Outline Ocean Stewardship Policy.
December 29, 2005
Something hopeful is stirring in both the executive and legislative
branches of New York State government: a real awareness of the declining
numbers of finfish and shellfish, caused by overfishing, loss of habitat
and other stresses on the state's waters. Next week, in his final State
of the State message, Gov. George Pataki should seize on that dawning
mindfulness and begin to outline his vision for a world-class New York
approach to enlightened ocean stewardship.
Pataki has earned a reputation for environmental leadership, and now he
has a chance to build on that. In fact, he's showing signs that he's
ready. In late October, a few days after Assemb. Thomas DiNapoli
(D-Great Neck) chaired a Jones Beach hearing on ocean issues, Pataki
hosted an ocean and Great Lakes symposium in New York City.
The symposium briefing paper began with a reminder about two recent
reports that have laid the groundwork for future efforts to save our
oceans: one from the independent Pew Oceans Commission, the other from
the congressionally created U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy. Despite
their differing origins, the two commissions reached similar conclusions
about the broad threats to our oceans, such as overfishing, habitat
destruction and declining water quality. And they made specific calls
for action.
As the symposium brief makes clear, New York has a real stake in
protecting its waters: hundreds of miles of Atlantic and Great Lakes
shoreline, 1,530 square miles of bays and estuaries on Long Island, and
an annual $11.5 billion in economic activity flowing from seafood, sport
and commercial fishing and industries that depend on them.
But that industry is hurting here. As Sarah Chasis of the Natural
Resources Defense Council and David Conover of Stony Brook University's
Marine Sciences Research Center told DiNapoli's committee, the weight of
seafood at New York docks is just 25 percent of what it was 50 years
ago.
The two commission reports provide a factual basis. Now Pataki should
use the State of the State to call for legislation that will set up a
permanent ocean council to coordinate all state policy for preserving
our waters. It would be great if he used the speech to commit New York
to ecosystem-based management, an approach that looks at all marine life
as an organic whole, not as a series of isolated species to be
exploited. Then he should spend his final year in office launching this
pivotal initiative.
Copyright 2005 Newsday Inc.
BACK TO TOP
|
The Need for Healthier
Schools
by Stephen Boese
December 12, 2005
Most people think all asbestos was removed from New York City public
schools years ago. So participants in a New York State Assembly hearing
on healthy schools earlier this year were shocked to learn that last
year construction workers who were replacing a gym floor at P.S. 219 in
Brownsville, Brooklyn inadvertently released the flaky white substance
throughout the building. The school was shut down immediately for an
emergency cleanup. Student and faculty health was jeopardized, and
valuable learning time was lost.
The legislators were even more shocked to learn that no one knows how
many other New York City school buildings still contain asbestos;
records at the Department of Education are incomplete.
At the Healthy
Schools Network, our files are filled with reports from parents and
teachers who are struggling to deal with unusual and unnerving illnesses
affecting their children, students and coworkers. But it is not possible
to do a scientific study to see if environmental conditions in their
schools are at fault. The data is simply not available; neither city nor
state officials keep track. But ignoring the problem will not make it go
away.
ILLNESSES AND ABSENCES
Students spend nearly a quarter of their waking hours in school
buildings that parents trust are safe. Unfortunately, there are real
reasons for concern in many public schools. The
U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency has said that environmental health hazards like
mold infestations, toxic chemicals, diesel fumes and contaminated
renovation debris, along with other pollutants such as pesticides and
toxic cleaning and maintenance products, can foul a school’s indoor air
quality. In fact, the EPA estimates that about half of the nation's
schools have poor indoor air, a major health hazard. In the winter, as
schools shut their windows and children spend more time indoors, the
problem becomes even worse.
In New York City, the state Assembly heard testimony from Avril
Dannenbaum, whose seven-year-old son attended PS 111 in Manhattan. He
has a chronic infection that compromises his immune system. His mother
says she can manage his infection and his seasonal allergies at home.
“But then,” she explained, “if you add on environmental allergens in his
school, such as a dirty rug to sit on, peeling, flaking paint from the
walls and window sills, along with industrial cleaning products and
insecticides, you have a child who comes close to shutdown. Then he is
unable to learn or function in class.”
While many problems afflict older schools, new ones are not immune.
Tests found
high levels of two chlorine solvents at a new high school in the
Soundview section of the Bronx, hastily constructed in an old Loral
Electronics factory. Both are known to cause serious ailments, including
cancer. Assured by authorities that the vapors were below threat levels,
parents later found out that city tests of soil and ground water at the
site had revealed serious lead, mercury, cadmium, and chromium
contamination.
A PROBLEM IGNORED
With parents, the press, and the political establishment all
demanding tougher academic standards and higher test scores, physical
conditions in the schools tend to be ignored. Proposals abound for how
the city might spend the billions it is owed under the
Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit, but none of them includes any
mention of using some of the money to make schools more environmentally
healthy.
These health policies and practices have a direct impact on academic
achievement and efficient allocation of education funds for every child.
Poor environmental conditions in schools sicken students, teachers and
staff, and inhibit academic performance. And our neediest children also
need the healthiest schools. Poor school facilities contribute to a poor
leaning environment that can undermine children’s health, attendance and
test scores.
The American Lung Association, along with the federal Centers for
Disease Control and the EPA, agree that asthma is the number one reason
for school absenteeism due to chronic disease in
New York’s schools. The city has some of the
worst asthma rates in the nation, and the disease is epidemic in
many neighborhoods, especially communities of color and among the poor.
Public health officials studying urban asthma think a cleaner classroom
environment could help control the crisis.
CLEARING THE AIR
There is some good news to report.
Coal
boilers, which remained in some New York City schools for more than
20 years after they were outlawed in other facilities, have now all been
removed. In 1999, the state Education Department issued
minimal standards and procedures for school indoor environmental quality
and health and safety. State legislation has banned arsenic-infused
pressure treated wood (commonly used in playground equipment),
pesticide-laden cake toilet deodorizers and elemental mercury (a potent
neurotoxin) in schools. Schools must now provide notification when they
plan to apply toxic pesticides.
In August, Governor George Pataki signed
legislation requiring schools to use environmentally preferable
(green)
cleaning products. The state Office of General Services already does
this for state facilities, so the healthy products are readily
available. Reducing student and staff exposure to industrial strength
chemicals will help reduce school absenteeism. The program will take
effect with the start of the September 2006 school year.
Both the city and state are moving toward implementing guidelines to
assure that all school construction and renovations meet high standards
for health. In New York City, a broad coalition of environmental, labor,
health and healthy schools advocates were pleased when the City Council
passed a green building standards
bill earlier this year and Mayor Michael Bloomberg signed it into
law in October. This significant legislation requires that all public
construction, including schools, meet standards for
environmentally friendly – or green – buildings by January 2007. By
requiring better ventilation and barring the use of toxic paints,
carpets and other materials, this measure will help improve student
health and performance.
WHAT MORE CAN BE DONE
Now it is time to take further steps. Fortunately, protecting our
children will not add billions to the cost of education.
At the federal level, Senator Hillary Clinton secured amendments to
the 2002
No
Child Left Behind law, which for the first time defined healthy and
high performance school standards in federal law. This legislation
required a comprehensive federal study of how school environmental
quality affects student health and learning. But Washington’s
follow-through has been flawed. The report, which was produced last
year, has yet to be released to the public. Clinton’s initiative also
established a grant program for states to spur the development of
healthier schools. Unfortunately, Congress has neglected to fund this
despite intensive advocacy by the
National Coalition for Healthier Schools (in .pdf format), a
coalition of over 300 organizations and individuals led by the Healthy
Schools Network.
New York State also needs to do more. Albany offers a
Green Building Tax Credit that gives incentives to commercial
developers to design and construct green buildings, but the credit is
not available for schools. Pataki has signed an executive order that
requires all state public construction to meet the standards of the
Green Building Tax Credit. But while the state recommends that schools
meet those standards, it does not require them to do so. That should
change.
And the state should move ahead on initiatives already in the works,
such as a joint project of the
New York State Energy
Research and Development Authority and the State Education
Department to develop healthy and high performance school design
standards. The legislature should pass a bill introduced by Senator
James Alesi and Assemblymember Steven Englebright that would require
healthy and high performance design standards for all New York schools.
For parents, teachers and school staff, such improvements cannot come
soon enough. As Avril Dannenbaum told state lawmakers about her child,
“I can make his home as safe as possible, but it’s at school that he
needs to be able to function well to learn optimally. I’d like you to
make his school a safe place where he can study and reach his full
potential.”
Stephen Boese is the New York State director of the
Healthy Schools
Network
BACK TO TOP
|
Environmental Advocates of New York
Board of Directors Resolution
Whereas, Jeff Jones has
served Environmental Advocates for more than ten years as Director
of Communications, and in that capacity has made a significant
contribution to protect the people, wildlife, and natural resources
of New York State; and
Whereas, Jeff has played a
leadership role in efforts to restore the historic Hudson River, to
protect the majestic Adirondack and Catskill Mountains, to address
pressing urban environmental problems, and to secure more funding
for pivotal state environmental programs, and has advanced numerous
other vitally important environmental, public health, and
environmental justice issues throughout News York State and beyond;
and
Whereas, Jeff has deftly
educated the media, policy-makers, and the public at large,
including scores of school children each year at Earth Day Lobby
Day, about environmental issues as they unfolded at the State
Capitol; and
Whereas, Jeff has been a
treasured colleague, friend, and mentor to many Environmental
Advocates staff members and board members, providing guidance and
support often with humor and patience on a broad range of
cutting-edge environmental issues;
Be it resolved that the
Board of Directors of Environmental Advocates expresses its sincere
appreciation for Jeff’s hard work and dedication to protecting New
York’s environment and extends its best wishes to Jeff for his
continued success in all his future endeavors.
Signed:
Irv Flinn, President
December 5, 2005
BACK TO TOP
|
|
|
August 26, 2005
To Whom It May Concern:
After more than 10 years as
communications director of Environmental Advocates, I and the
organization have agreed that the time has come for me to explore other
options in my professional career. I move on from Environmental
Advocates with a feeling of great satisfaction for all that we have
accomplished during the past decade.
-
Many New Yorkers are less exposed to
pesticides in their daily lives than they were 10 years ago, thanks to
the state's pesticide registry and neighbor notification law.
-
State health officials are better able
to fight New York's debilitating asthma epidemic, thanks to the
expansion of the system that collects data on hospital admissions to
include emergency room visits.
-
The federal government has ordered
General Electric to clean toxic PCBs from the Hudson River.
-
New York has the best brownfields law
in the country, and the foundation has been laid for an urban
revitalization program that will successfully direct tax dollars and
development back to the state's cities, while at the same time relieving
some of the pressure of sprawling development on greenfields and working
farms.
-
The state Environmental Protection
Fund is again growing to help protect New York's natural resources,
wilderness areas and working farms.
-
Toxic cleaning products will be
removed from our children's schools.
-
New York is taking steps to control
emissions of pollutants that cause global warming.
-
Renewable energy sources, including
wind power, are increasing in the state as a cost-efficient alternative
to fossil fuels.
-
Historic efforts are underway to
protect the Great Lakes watershed from exploitation and misuse.
Environmental Advocates has been at
the center of my advocacy work for the past 10 years. I want to thank
all those I have worked with in the organization during this time. I
especially want to thank my colleagues on staff for their ambitious,
relentless and creative efforts to protect New York's environment,
fighting for clean water, clean air and the health of our families. I
have every confidence that the organization will continue to play a
leading role in New York's environmental movement and that it deserves
our full support.
Signed:
Jeff Jones
BACK TO TOP
|
Thai Jones chronicles two generations
of family radicalism By Stephen
Leon, Metroland Magazine
Witnesses to a
century
In the early ’90s,
when Jeff Jones worked at Metroland as a staff writer, his
teenage son Thai used to drop by our offices with his friends. In
their ragtag appearance, their shuffling gait, their often-sullen
facial expressions, they looked like stereotypical bored teenagers,
perhaps with mischief on their minds, not quite comfortable among
the adults in Dad’s office. Metroland’s founder, Peter
Iselin, repeated a standing joke every time we watched them skulk
through our corridors: He’d lean to me and exclaim, in mock
disapproval, “Subversives!”
In March 1970, a
bomb-making accident blew up a Greenwich Village townhouse and
killed three members of Students for a Democratic Society, the most
radical (and violent) faction of which was evolving into the Weather
Underground. Later that month, Jeff Jones was scheduled to appear in
a Chicago courtroom to face charges stemming from his prominent role
in the October 1969 street brawl with cops known as the Days of
Rage. With federal investigators intensifying their efforts to track
down radicals like Jones, and with a looming court date—which Jones
planned to skip, officially making him a fugitive—he decided to
visit his father in California before going underground so his dad
might worry a little less if he didn’t hear from him for years.
Albert Jones, a Quaker and a pacifist who had refused to fight in
World War II, agreed with his son about many things—but not the
Weathermen’s embracing the tactic of violence. “Son, I believe very
strongly in your goals,” he had told Jeff just before the Days of
Rage. “But if you set out to hurt somebody, I would hope and pray
that you are hurt first.”
The description of
the brief meeting of father and son in A Radical Line is full
of the kind of detail that humanizes the book’s sweeping political
saga. “Albert preferred not to know what his son was up to, and Jeff
was in no hurry to fill him in,” writes Thai Jones in his book,
released last month by Free Press. “Still, the comforts of the
family nest—sitting on the sofa drinking a beer and watching TV—were
a welcome change from the rigors of organizing. In the evening, Jeff
walked out of the house and wandered through the foothills of the
San Gabriel Mountains, listening to the coyotes as the sun swept
west across the valley.”
A Radical Line:
From the Labor Movement to the Weather Underground, One Family’s
Century of Conscience chronicles two generations of activist
family history: the author’s parents, Jeff Jones and Eleanor Stein,
and their activities with the SDS and the Weather Underground at the
height of the ’60s protest era; the Communist affiliation and
civil-rights and labor activism of Eleanor’s parents, Arthur and
Annie Stein; and the deeply felt pacifism of Albert Jones, whose
conscientious objection to World War II landed him in an isolated
work camp far from his new wife. Throughout, it is a story not only
of the century’s most significant leftist political movements, but
also of one family’s struggles to balance their radical commitments
with the burdens such a life can bestow on spouses, sons and
daughters, and parents. “I never wanted it to just be a memoir,”
Jones says. “My picture was, a history of these movements, told
through the prism of the family.”
When Jeff and Thai
Jones sat down to be interviewed for this story earlier this week,
Eleanor was not with them: She prefers not to be interviewed, and
has chosen to let Jeff and Thai do all the talking. This is mildly
ironic, given that the book originally was her idea. While Thai was
studying for a masters at Columbia Journalism School, he wanted to
take a popular book-writing class taught by Sam Friedman—but needed
a book proposal in order to enroll. “So at the last second,” he
says, “I called Eleanor, and she came up with this whole idea at
midnight on the day of the deadline. So it’s essentially her idea.”
Friedman has good
contacts with publishing agents, and his classes already had
produced several book contracts. He hooked up Jones with a couple of
agents, and one liked it, so he was soon on his way—to Vegas.
The first thing Thai
wanted to do was interview Jeff’s parents, divorced and living on
the West Coast. He had met his paternal grandparents before, but in
Las Vegas, where Al was now living, they got closer. “We went out,
played the slot machines, had buffets, and went home and talked
politics,” Thai recalls fondly of his September stay in Vegas. He
also was pleased with the pieces of family history he got from
Jeff’s mother and father, but the other side of the family was
trickier, as Eleanor’s parents both had been dead for some time—and
they had kept most of their political activities secret, even from
their daughter.
“I felt like I could
do [the book] when I got the FBI files for Eleanor’s parents, about
whom we knew almost nothing, just a little tidbit of family lore. A
lot of that was really sketchy, but when I read hundreds and
hundreds of pages of FBI files, I knew. . . that was the part I was
most worried about, but in the end I had more documentation on that
than almost anything else.”
Certain now that he
could complete the project, Thai researched his subject intensively,
though interviews, newspaper accounts—even weather reports from
local newspapers on the day of a given event or meeting, so he could
add that detail to his narrative. And he interviewed his parents
extensively, but there were ground rules: “Our deal was that
everything we told him would be the truth,” says Jeff, but that
there were some things they wouldn’t talk about. For example, to
this day, there are more than 20 bombings that no one has ever been
charged with—because no one knows who actually put what where. And
everybody from the Weather Underground community, despite all the
bickering that broke them apart over the years, has remained
tight-lipped. Jeff and Eleanor weren’t about to break that pattern.
Asked what else he
has learned from the process, Thai blurts out, “Not to be too
optimistic about the future of the left”—at which, for the first
time during the interview, Jeff (though laughing) looks like he
disagrees.
“I wouldn’t put it
quite the same way, but . . .”
But Thai continues,
citing a familiar pattern: national emergency followed by government
repression followed by a period of apologizing. “You sort of feel
frustrated,” he says, “because you see the same pattern happening
over and over again, with no progression.”
Jeff Jones, 57, and
Eleanor Stein, 58, have lived in Albany now for 18 and a half years.
She is a professor at Albany Law School; he is communications
director for Environmental Advocates of New York. Thai, 27, recently
had been staying with his parents but has now rented a bungalow in
Woodstock to work on his next book proposal. A graduate of Vassar
and Columbia, Thai has been a clerk for the Albany Times Union
and an intern and reporter for Newsday. (Thai’s younger
brother, Arthur, also lives in Albany.)
At the front of
Thai’s book is a brief, harrowing narrative of the night in 1981
when the feds stormed the family apartment in Manhattan (Thai was 4)
to arrest his parents—effectively ending the fugitive part of their
lives. Immediately, the reader focuses on how their radicalism might
burden their own next generation.
Although Thai claims
to remember the bust (Jeff and Eleanor did not end up getting
sentenced to time in prison), he also says he knew relatively little
of their past lives as a youth—except that he grew up in a sort of
community of lefties, with their children, their stories, their
traditions; he says he even “went to a Jewish Communist
indoctrination summer camp.” And, he notes wryly, “there were always
those picnics where they were passing around cigarettes . . .”
A self-described
“armchair radical” who prefers the solitude of writing to any sort
of group political activity, Thai clearly is on a different path the
one taken by his parents. He also has a unique perspective on what
he has learned about their radical days. “The hardest thing for me
has always been, even now, picturing Jeff doing the things that he
is famous for doing, in 1969,” Thai says. “I think Jeff is totally
mellow and mild-mannered, but [he’s] famous for running up and
jumping on stages, shoving people away from the microphone, and I
cannot picture that. . . . I think it shows how unnatural is was for
him, and all of them. The thing about the Weathermen is that it was
a bunch of middle-class, white, young adults, who just felt totally
uncomfortable with the idea of violence, but who felt they had to
will themselves to do it.”
Somewhat
surprisingly, Jeff agrees. “Yeah, I think that’s very insightful. I
think back to some of the things I did, and just like him, I can
hardly imagine doing them. The scariest thing I ever did was the
first night of the demonstrations in Chicago in 1969, that became
known as the Days of Rage, I led the crowd out of Lincoln Park and
headed toward Judge [Julius] Hoffman’s house, and that’s where we
had this tremendous battle with the police on the Near North Side of
Chicago. To this day, that’s the scariest moment of my life, is
those 15 minutes before, just saying, ‘Alright, I’m going to get up,
I’m going to give this speech, and people are going to follow me out
of this park. And who knows what’s gonna happen.’”
Thai: “They worked
for months to gut-check themselves into doing that, and then they
went, they threw some punches . . . and now, 30 years later, they’ll
all tremble at the thought . . . and they’ll all apologize . . . and
it just shows, how unnatural all of that was.”
Though Jeff Jones has
always said he has never regretted the choices he made, he does
acknowledge the toll those choices took on Al Jones. One of the
central tensions of the book, says Thai, is Jeff and his father.
“Because his father’s stance was all about being peaceful, and Jeff
grew up a Quaker, but his moral compass put him to the opposite of
that.”
Thanks to the book,
Jeff accompanied Thai to Las Vegas for part of his interview, and
got a rare chance to work through a lifetime of baggage. “We talked
on levels about things that we had never talked about before—and
that we probably never would have talked about if it wasn’t for this
book,” Jeff says. “I’m aware that the choices that I made at that
point in my life were very painful to my father, caused him lot of
grief—he had to deal with a lot of things that he didn’t
particularly want to deal with. . . . I was really glad when it was
over and we had all survived and come out the other side, and put
our lives back together. And we’ve become friends.”
Also, after the
townhouse explosion, Jeff’s pacifist background crept back to the
fore, and he was instrumental in pushing the Weathermen to keep the
bombings low-impact—and no one else died in any of them. He says he
believes his father takes some pride in that Jeff, at that time,
pushed the Weathermen back from the brink of violence.
And Jeff, in turn, is
taking great pride in his son’s accomplishment. “I’m proud of the
job that he did, and I feel that he’s done a very honest
appreciation of the history. . . . I think our relationship has
strengthened through this process,” Jeff says. “I mean, what more
could you ask for than to have your son interested in your history
and willing to write about it—and not completely reject it or make
fun of it? I get a real feeling of warmth and love from the book.
“The lesson that I’m
learning right now,” he adds, “is what it means to have been part of
making some history, and then watching the process by which future
generations redefine that and turn it into something that has
meaning to them. I don’t put a whole lot of my effort any longer
into trying to defend the way I saw things at the time, or even the
way I see things now. I’m much more interested in learning what has
some relevance to people today.
“I’m proud to have
met Eleanor and been part of these two families that have resisted a
lot of the evils of our government over what turns out to be close
to a century,” Jeff adds. “And I hope that stands for something
people find some positives in.”
Thai adds that he
hopes people his age read it, as it is the first take on this slice
of history by someone of his generation.
And though he clearly
is not subversive in the way his parents once were, Thai says he is
very proud of his parents and grandparents and the commitment they
made to what they believed in.
Asked if he ever
wished they were more normal, Thai answers quickly: “If I had normal
parents, I wouldn’t have a book.”
BACK TO TOP
|
|
Pataki Moves to Create Empire State Greenway by Developing 524-Mile
WaterfrontGov.
By Al Baker
George E. Pataki offered a plan on
Friday to transform the Erie Canal and the land along its shores into a
waterfront greenway and link it with similar eco-friendly tracts to its east
and west. The plan came months after the state Canal Corporation's deal to
sell development rights along the canal was plagued by scandal.
At a news conference at a canal port in
Little Falls, just west of Albany, Mr. Pataki said his plan to recast the
524-mile waterfront as a linear park dotted by tourist destinations, natural
vistas and trails would unite the Hudson and Niagara greenways to form the
Empire State Greenway, ''one of the largest greenways in the nation.''
Environmentalists quickly embraced the
idea of ''water-dependent development'' along the canal. They said it would
improve the struggling upstate economy through which the all-but-forsaken
canal flows, and lure visitors with the promise of biking, hiking, boating
and fishing amid the panoramic corridors of New York's interior.
''It would really link New York City to
Buffalo,'' said John Stouffer, legislative director for the Atlantic chapter
of the Sierra Club. ''Potentially, you could bike to Buffalo, or, if you
were willing to brave the Hudson River, you could paddle to Buffalo.''
But hurdles remain before Mr. Pataki's
vision can take root, Mr. Stouffer said, adding that he would watch closely
to make sure that improving water quality, recreational activities and
public access to the waterfront remained priorities over time.
In outlining his plan, the governor
called for a grass-roots approach to greenway development. He nominated
Carmella R. Mantello, the executive director of the Hudson River Valley
Greenway Communities Council, to serve as director of the Canal Corporation,
a subsidiary of the New York State Thruway Authority, which oversees the
canal system.
If her appointment is approved by the
corporation's board, Ms. Mantello will lead a task force of representatives
from several state agencies and localities along the canal who would solicit
suggestions from federal, state and local planners before sending
recommendations to the governor within six months.
Those recommendations would ''form the
basis'' of legislation that Mr. Pataki would submit to lawmakers in Albany
next year to create the canal greenway, said Kevin C. Quinn, a spokesman for
the governor.
Depending on what the task force
recommends, parts of the development plan itself could also require state
lawmakers' approval, state officials said.
An investigation by the state attorney
general's office and the state inspector general's office found that the
Canal Corporation's previous deal to sell development rights along the canal
for $30,000 was fraught with favoritism and ethics violations.
While the Canal Corporation ''lost
credibility'' in that affair, it is ''getting back on track,'' with the new
plan, said Jeff Jones, a spokesman for Environmental Advocates of New
York, a nonprofit group that monitors state government.
The gathering of grass-roots input from
communities along the canal in advance of developers' proposals is a
reversal of state policy, said Michael R. Fleischer, the executive director
of the Thruway Authority.
Next, Mr. Jones said, the state should
expand on the governor's plan by linking all of its canals and the St.
Lawrence Seaway with its largest rivers. ''That would create a world class
destination for eco-tourism that would rival the great waterways of
Europe,'' he said.
BACK TO
TOP
|
Son's book chronicles a
radical family tree By MARC HUMBERT
As the heavily armed FBI agents stormed into the
apartment to arrest his parents, the 4-year-old walked to his bedroom
and took his little scissors out of a drawer.
"The ends were rounded, and the blades were covered by blue plastic
guards," Thai Jones recalled.
"I considered putting on the cowboy hat and charging into the hallway
with scissors blazing to defeat these men who had come to hurt our
family. Even then, I knew it was a battle against long odds. But I
didn't realize it was a question that many in my family had already
faced. They had chosen to fight.
"For me the decision was easy to make. I returned the scissors and
closed the drawer. I went out to the hallway where my father was
manacled, slid my small fingers around the cold cuffs into his palm, and
stood with him in the corridor holding hands.
"This is my earliest memory," Jones writes of the scene on Oct. 23, 1981
that provides the poignant opening for "A Radical Line: From the Labor
Movement to the Weather Underground, One Family's Century of
Conscience."
What follows over the next 285 pages is the colorful history of his
Weather Underground parents and activist grandparents.
Sitting next to a huge stone fireplace in the restored mill he is
renting for the winter on the outskirts of Woodstock, the village
immortalized by the '60s counterculture, Jones recently talked about mom
and dad, then and now.
"For me, the hardest mental jump was imagining him doing the things that
he's famous for. He was a wild man - climbing up on stages and grabbing
microphones and pushing people off," the son said. "He's so
mild-mannered."
An early leader of the Students for a Democratic Society,
Jeff Jones helped give birth to the revolutionary Weather
Underground movement. He led the charge onto the streets of Chicago in
the infamous "Days of Rage" demonstration in October 1969.
It was at the beginning of the next year that Jeff Jones
went underground, not to surface again publicly until the bust in the
Bronx apartment.
During that time, Thai Jones' mother, Eleanor Stein, would leave his
father after other Weather Underground leaders purged him for pushing a
less violent agenda than they wanted. He favored blowing up objects, not
people. She was pregnant with Thai at the time. The couple were apart
for a year.
Thai did not learn of the separation until he started the book.
"I was never going to tell you that," his mother told him.
But she did. The book, after all, was her idea.
Thai, pursuing a master's degree at the Columbia School of Journalism,
was taking a book-writing course and had a book proposal due.
"I called my mom in a panic and said do you have any book ideas and she
said, to her utter dismay ever since, why don't you do the story of the
grandparents because that's what makes it different than other '60s
stories," he said.
"The next thing I knew, we had a book deal," the author said.
For his parents, there was pride, but also practical concern. There
would be ground rules.
"We said we would answer all questions truthfully, not necessarily
completely," the elder Jones said. "He would have to respect that there
were areas we didn't want to talk about and mainly that would have to do
with anything that could get anybody else in trouble."
The author readily agreed.
"My goal with the book is not to get my parents put in jail," he said.
The son also set some limits.
"I said, 'There's not going to be any sex in this book about the '60s.
I'm going to put in as much rock 'n' roll, drugs and car chases as I
can,"' he recalled.
While there are few details about the Weather Underground bombings and
other illegal activity, the book contains plenty of tidbits that bring
the parents and grandparents to life.
There is Jeff living on a houseboat in San Francisco Bay with Weather
Underground icon Bernardine Dohrn - she sunbathed on the rooftop patio -
and helping arrange for the 1970 prison escape of LSD-guru Timothy
Leary.
Eleanor's parents were Communists. Arthur Stein was called twice before
the House Committee on Un-American Activities. Annie Stein became a
major figure in the civil rights movement and was active throughout the
anti-Vietnam War movement.
Jeff's parents were Quakers and pacifists. Albert Jones spent World War
II in a camp for conscientious objectors. Millie Jones ran off in 1967
with one of her adult violin students.
Jeff was a blond-haired California kid when he went east to Antioch
College and two years later to New York City. Disillusioned by Lyndon
Johnson's expansion of the Vietnam War and spurred on by the writings of
Karl Marx and other revolutionaries, he was soon an SDS leader, a rebel
with a cause - decked out in jeans, leather jacket and cowboy boots.
Eleanor Stein was the classic New York City kid - big hoop earrings,
tall boots and short skirts. She embraced the anti-war movement during
the Mark Rudd-led takeover at Columbia University in 1968 while a law
student there. By the end of 1969, she had withdrawn from law school and
left her first husband, Jonah Raskin, who later became a leader of the
Yippies and an Abbie Hoffman biographer. Eleanor had also laid eyes on
Jeff for the first time.
By 1971, the two had gotten to know each other while driving across
America, were hiding out in the Catskills north of New York City and
falling in love.
A decade later, the two would be arrested in their Bronx apartment. Both
faced felony explosives possession charges and Jeff also had a
misdemeanor riot count against him from the Days of Rage protests.
They worried what might happen to Thai while they were behind bars.
"I was expecting to go to jail for a couple of years," said the fugitive
father.
A judge, however, sentenced Jeff to 18 months probation and six months
of community service. All charges were dropped against Eleanor.
"The judge, I believe, saw us as a family that was coming out the other
side of this political experience," Jeff recalled recently.
Thai, whose birth certificate had identified him as Ty Emerson, returned
to his day-care center where he had been known as Timmy - life
underground meant aliases, even for the kids. The teacher told the other
children that Timmy was now Thai.
"None of the other four-year-olds found this odd," Thai wrote, "but
several of them thought it would be fun to change their names."
Jeff drove the school bus for his son's day-care center for the six
months community service, later got a job as a printer and then became a
newspaper reporter. Eleanor went back to law school.
In 1986, the family of four - a second son, Arthur "Bluejay" Jones, was
born in 1982 - moved to Albany. Mom had gotten a job as a clerk at the
New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest tribunal, and would later
go on to a distinguished career with the state's Public Service
Commission. She is now a professor at Albany Law School. Dad was a
reporter covering state government for an alternative weekly newspaper
and has since become the director of communications for Environmental
Advocates, a lobbying group.
In late August, Thai joined thousands of others on the streets of New
York City to protest the war in Iraq as the Republican National
Convention began. Despite that, his father says he expects his son to
follow a different road than the one traveled by the rest of the family.
"Thai very clearly wants to be a reporter, a historian and an observer,
more than a participant," Jeff said recently as he sat in the ornate
lobby of New York's state Senate in Albany. "And, as a parent, knowing
perfectly well what I put my parents through, I would be delighted if
that's the path Thai chooses."
It appears Thai has already made that choice.
"For one thing, it's impossible to be rebellious with parents who are
literally icons of rebellion and revolution," he explained.
Looking back, Thai acknowledges his parents gave up a lot for a cause.
"For them, those were the most exciting years of their lives," he said.
"So, personally, I don't think they were wasted (years). Politically,
it's hard to point to any real significant achievements of the Weather
Underground."
"I feel great joy in the book," the father said, "because even though he
makes fun of us and he ultimately maybe doesn't agree that it was worth
it, he respects it."
BACK TO TOP
|
|
Family memoir details radical life on the
run By Paul Grondahl
Jeff Jones is only half-joking
when he says he's living a parent's worst nightmare.
His son grew up to be a writer and has published a book about the
family's checkered past.
In what amounts to the first detailed public "outing" of his parents'
involvement with the Weather Underground and 1960s militant activism,
Thai Jones, 27, of Albany, has written his first book, "A Radical Line."
The nonfiction volume blends social history with family memoir. It
chronicles three generations of leftist politics that grow strongly from
both branches of his family tree. The story moves from his grandparents'
work with the Communist Party in the 1950s, to his father's dozen
arrests for inciting riots as a leader of Students for a Democratic
Society and other radical acts, to his own childhood lived under an
assumed name amid the turbulent undertow of his parents' maneuvers to
avoid an FBI manhunt.
"My goal was never to get my parents thrown in jail," Thai says. He
worked as an editorial assistant at the Times Union and Newsday before
completing a master's degree at Columbia University's School of
Journalism. He recently quit his job at Barnes & Noble bookstore in
Colonie to travel around the country to promote his book.
His 57-year-old father, Jeff Jones, is a lobbyist and
spokesman for Environmental Advocates of New York, based in
Albany, and will accompany his son to some of the bookstore appearances
on the West Coast.
Thai's mother, Eleanor Stein, 58, a professor at Albany Law School who
specializes in telecommunications law, recently retired as
administrative law judge with the state Public Service Commission.
Stein's radical adventures figure prominently in her son's book, but she
avoids interviews and prefers to remain in the background during the
book's promotion.
Paradoxically, the book was mom's idea. She answered a frantic,
late-night call from Thai. He had procrastinated on an assignment to
write a book proposal for a class at Columbia. Mom bailed him out by
suggesting he write about their family's colorful political activism.
"And she's regretted it ever since," Thai said.
He's sitting at the antique table in his family's dining room in their
book-crammed, comfortably unkempt Pine Hills bungalow. A '60s tapestry
covers falling plaster from a roof leak. His mom's evocative landscape
paintings brighten the walls. Outside, the shrubs and grass bear the
shaggy, au naturel condition of an unrepentant environmentalist. The
Jeep Cherokee in the driveway is the only jarring sight in the picture.
"Ohhhh, you're busted, dad," Thai said.
"Guilty. I can't justify it," his dad said. "I'm not a perfect
environmentalist."
He argues that the 4-year-old Jeep is his fourth Cherokee and he's loyal
to the brand. He points out that he and his wife share one vehicle as
they have for the 18 years they've lived in Albany -- the longest stop
in an itinerant life.
Listening to the father and son discuss and debate their perspectives on
the Vietnam War, civil rights and political activism -- the father's
from firsthand experience, with the scars to prove it, and the son's
from interviews and books -- is like "Crossfire" meets "The Real World."
"The more I researched the Weather Underground, the more I saw you guys
as cultish. I do poke fun at it sometimes," Thai said with a smirk. "I
found it kind of laughable when you tried to transform yourselves from
student activists in SDS to stone communist revolutionaries fighting for
oppressed people the world over."
His dad countered: "We believed the world was in a time of revolution
and we saw ourselves as true revolutionaries. Looking back on it now, we
are who we are. We were middle-class, white suburban kids."
Early on in researching the book, Thai agreed to ground rules with his
parents. They could decline to talk about certain incidents or people in
the interviews, but anything they told him would be accurate. He also
allowed his parents to read a draft of the manuscript and they consulted
with a lawyer, who said the statute of limitations had run out on any
criminal activities in which they might have been involved.
The publisher, Free Press, a division of Simon & Schuster, also reviewed
the manuscript in their legal department. "Their main concern was that
my parents would sue me for libel," Thai said. So far, that hasn't
happened.
"I had some concerns at the outset, but I had no choice because Thai got
an agent and a book contract on his own," his dad said. "Now that he's
finished, I feel very proud as his father and think the book he's
written is accurate and it doesn't de-legitimize what we did."
"A Radical Line" is marked by a straightforward, detached journalistic
tone throughout. The son refers to his parents in the third-person and
he has a crime reporter's style of sticking to the facts even when they
involve his kin.
Such as his dad's bust in Hoboken, N.J., in 1979 for growing marijuana
on the roof of their apartment building.
"I can't justify that, except to say I was very much a part of the
hippie pot culture of that time and I found it liberating," his dad
said. "I regret that we put Thai in harm's way when he was young. But I
think we were good parents. We were transitioning from living
underground to an above-ground existence when he was born."
The book project was an intense education for Thai, who wrote "A Radical
Line" in his bedroom at his parent's house after moving back from
Brooklyn. "I knew none of this history when I started," he said. "I'll
never view my parents the same way again."
Thai's younger brother, Arthur, 22, whom the family calls "Bluejay,"
also recently moved back into his parent's home. He displaced his mom
from her art studio. He works as a cook at Ground Round and plans to
study history at the University at Albany.
"Talk about a parent's worst nightmare," the father said. "Both our sons
are living back at home."
BACK TO TOP
|
|
Quieter Lives for 60's
Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded
By Daniel Wakin
When explosives accidentally demolished a
Greenwich Village town house 33 years ago, three young militants inside
were killed, leaving two of their comrades to stagger out and into
clandestine life. All were members of the Weathermen, a violent offshoot
of 1960's radicalism.
One of the survivors, Kathy Boudin, was granted parole last week for her
role in a 1981 armored car robbery that left a Brink's guard and two
police officers dead.
The Boudin case was a compelling reminder of a turbulent era. But the
other woman who escaped serves as another reminder, of how a once
revolutionary band has dispersed into the rhythms of quieter lives and
more peaceful, but not always more remorseful, idealism.
The woman, Cathy Wilkerson, lives in Brooklyn. The mother of a grown
daughter, she has spent the past two decades teaching mathematics in
high schools and adult education programs.
Many former Weathermen have taken up careers that they see as an
extension of their political commitment: teaching, social work and
advocating causes like environmental protection, care for AIDS
patients and prisoners' rights. Today they proclaim the same ideals they
held four decades ago, and sharply condemn American policies at home and
abroad.
"They sustain certain kinds of ideological and ethical commitments into
their lives beyond the armed struggle," said Jeremy Varon, an assistant
professor of history at Drew University in Madison, N.J.
Members of the Weathermen began resurfacing in the late 1970's after the
group dissolved in 1976. Ms. Wilkerson emerged from hiding and
surrendered to the authorities in 1980. She spent 11 months in jail on
explosives charges in the explosion of the town house, on West 11th
Street, which was owned by her father.
Now, she said, she is working on her memoirs, part of a new round of
exploration of the Weather Underground, as it was later called by its
leaders who found the original name sexist. Professor Varon is writing
his own book about the group, which was the subject of "The Weather
Underground," a well-received documentary film that opened in June.
In a telephone interview on Friday, Ms. Wilkerson said it was the first
time she had spoken to a reporter in about 20 years.
"I'm re-entering the conversation," she said. "There are enormous
problems that we predicted in the 60's, around the environment, about
the wartime economy and permanent states of war, and there's a real
crisis of leadership about those issues. Talking about patriotism is a
way of distracting people as the world lumbers toward catastrophe."
Speaking in guarded tones, Ms. Wilkerson would not discuss the
explosion, saying she wanted to save it for her book. But she did say
that the Weather Underground's legacy of violence must be seen in the
context of the times.
"We were way not the first," she said. "It was a mass phenomenon. In
1969, national liberation was sweeping the world and looked like it was
going to be the main vehicle for ushering in popular governments. Now
the wave of violence sweeping the world is reactionary."
Like other former members, she said the movement made "mistakes,"
adding, "We were all young, under 25 for the most part."
Conservative critics, including Prof. Harvey Klehr, the Andrew W. Mellon
professor of politics and history at Emory University in Atlanta, have
little patience for that view. "It would behoove people like that who
did illegal, morally reprehensible things to have some sense of
remorse," he said.
Professor Klehr also took a dim view of the often stated account that
after the town house explosion, the Weathermen resolved to take no
lives, and that in the string of bombings that followed, no one was
seriously injured. He points out that members have said the explosives
at the town house were intended for an officers' dance at Fort Dix in
New Jersey and for Butler Library at Columbia University.
"The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere
incompetence," he said. "I don't know what sort of defense that is."
The Weathermen -- who took their name from the Bob Dylan lyric "You
don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind blows" -- originated
as a faction of Students for a Democratic Society.
The leaders came from reasonably well-off families, though several
interviewed said a common portrait of them as privileged children of the
rich was a caricature. Charismatic and articulate, they employed
revolutionary jargon, advocated armed struggle and black liberation and
began bombing buildings, taking responsibility for at least 20 attacks.
Estimates of their number ranged at times from several dozen to several
hundred.
Their revolutionary language pursues them to this day, including the
phrase attributed to Bill Ayers, a Weathermen founder, to "kill all the
rich people." Then there were the words of Bernardine Dohrn, another
founder, who seemed to delight in the Manson family murders before a
Students for a Democratic Society crowd in 1969. (She has since said it
was a joke.)
Mr. Ayers is distinguished professor of education at the University of
Illinois at Chicago. Ms. Dohrn, his wife, teaches law at Northwestern
University and is director of its Children and Family Justice Center.
Together they raised Ms. Boudin's only child, her son, Chesa Boudin, who
graduated from Yale in June and is a Rhodes scholar.
Mr. Ayers returned to the public eye two years ago with the publication
of a book, "Fugitive Days," about his life as a Weatherman. And while
they have been among the most outspoken members of the group, the couple
would not be interviewed because, they said, they did not want to
jeopardize Ms. Boudin's pending release. For the same reason, other
former members also said they did not want to talk publicly, or limited
their comments.
Four defendants in the Brink's case, two of them the former Weather
Underground members Judith Clark and David J. Gilbert, are serving life
prison terms with parole not scheduled for another half-century.
Another significant figure in the Weathermen was Jeff
Jones, one of a group of Ms. Boudin's friends and supporters who
lobbied for her parole. A former reporter for an alternative newspaper,
he is now communications director for an environmental lobbying
group in Albany. He said he felt "absolute horror at the idiocy" of the
Bush administration. In Iraq, he said, the president "has gone down the
path of Vietnam."
"We are now in a guerrilla war on foreign soil," Mr. Jones said.
Linda S. Evans, who was granted clemency by President Bill Clinton for
convictions related to bombings and released from prison in 2001 after
serving nearly 16 years, lives in Santa Rosa, Calif. She received a
Soros criminal justice fellowship from the Open Society Institute and
works to restore civil rights to felons. "I'm trying to make things
better in our society," she said in a telephone interview. "I just feel
really strongly that the policies of our government are just anti-human
at every level."
Mark Rudd, the Students for a Democratic Society leader from Columbia,
teaches mathematics at the Albuquerque Technical Vocational Institute, a
community college. He, too, has called the group's violence a "terrible
mistake."
An early organizer, Jonathan Lerner, wrote an article for The Washington
Post Magazine last year about his Weathermen days in which he denounced
the group as a "cult of leftist cynicism and violence" whose members
amounted to "political terrorists."
For most Weathermen, he wrote in the article, "the legal consequences
were negligible."
"We came to in a daze," he wrote. "We crawled off to lick our wounds,
learn to be responsible grown-ups -- hard work, for the inexperienced --
and come to terms with what we had done."
Brian Flanagan, who was acquitted of assault and attempted murder
charges stemming from the 1969 "Days of Rage" violence that surrounded
the Chicago Eight trial, owns a bar, the Night Cafe on the Upper West
Side, which was the setting for several interviews filmed for the recent
documentary "The Weather Underground," which was directed by Sam Green
and Bill Siegel.
The film revived contacts among former members, Mr. Flanagan said, and
prompted him and others to open up about the past in interviews and
public forums. He said he recently met up with Ms. Wilkerson in the bar,
which has become what he called "definitely a lefty bar."
"There were a lot of things I had trouble coming to terms with over the
years, and this has resurrected them," Mr. Flanagan said of the
documentary which, he said, portrayed him as more rueful than he felt.
"I was regretful over about 5 percent of what we did," he said. "I think
95 percent of what we did was great, and we'd do it again."
And what was the 5 percent? The town house, Mr. Flanagan said. When
pressed, he said he regretted both the deaths of the three Weathermen --
Ted Gold, Diana Oughton and Terry Robbins -- and the plan to bomb the
dance at Fort Dix and the library at Columbia, which could have taken
lives.
And life outside politics? "I run my business," he said. "I shoot pool,
I drink wine. I'm old and fat." He also mentioned winning $23,000 as a
contestant on "Jeopardy!"
"God bless America," Mr. Flanagan said.
BACK TO TOP
|
Another century finds more waterways
passable to the public By Michael
Virtanen
The Schroon River winds for miles through
private land on its way down into the lake, but the divide between
Adirondack property owners and paddlers stands in high relief at the
put-in.
The state canoe access site off Route 74 - a parking area with
narrow wooden steps to the river - is surrounded by signs that say
Private. The adjacent land is posted against trespassing.
"You actually have the right of way when you're on the water," said
Bruce Robinson, who rents canoes at Maypine Marine. But, he added,
you may not be able to get out and walk around on somebody's
property.
It's a thumbnail description of the current state of riparian
rights, an old issue in the Adirondacks, with as many twists as the
Schroon.
Ten years ago, five paddlers set out to clarify those rights. The
result was nine years of litigation, a decision from New York's
highest court affirming rights of recreational canoeists and a
settlement with a major landowner. Today, more of the state's rivers
are open to the public.
"The practical value of the case is really what everybody is crowing
about," says Tom Kligerman, organizer of the June 15, 1991, canoe
trip. He and four companions paddled 21 miles that day, 12 through
land owned and posted by the Adirondack League Club.
"Of course they claim they won. Both sides claim they won," says
Mart Allen, a former state forest ranger who was general manager of
the private fishing and hunting club at the time.
Paddlers still have no right to cross private land to reach a river,
to fish where the river passes through private land, or to camp
alongside it, Allen said. In a settlement with the 50,000-acre club,
paddlers can traverse the South Branch of the Moose
River only from May 1 to Oct. 15, and when the water is 2.65
feet or higher.
The Adirondack League Club was started in 1878, and its roughly 380
members pay taxes and dues, Allen said. "It's not cheap. ... It (the
court decision) diminished their rights of being an exclusive club.
It was a taking, as far as I'm concerned, without compensation."
Allen, who was made a life member of the club on retirement in 1992,
said the canoeists came specifically to provoke a confrontation,
which mainly amounted to Allen asking if they knew they were on
private land, asking them to leave and asking their names.
Shortly after that, the two canoes flipped in Grindstone Rapids,
within view of a small crowd of hunt club staff and members.
Kligerman, a state Transportation Department engineer in Albany,
headed the Adirondack Committee of the state chapter of the Sierra
Club. With him went Carl Anderson and Lorraine Van Hatten, canoeists
from the Utica area, journalist Jeff Jones, and Bob Wolff, a river
guide.
The four canoeists quickly righted their boats. Wolff, in a kayak,
retrieved paddles, and they continued through Adirondack League Club
property, later portaging around the 12-foot drop at Limekiln Falls,
reaching state land again in late afternoon.
"We expected them to do something. We had no idea we would be sued
for $5 million," Van Hatten says. "That sort of threw us for a
loop."
Nancy Jones, a Troy attorney and paddler, defended them pro bono.
The Adirondack Mountain Club and the state attorney general's office
intervened on their side.
Also in the boats was the influence of Paul Jamieson, author of the
1975 book "Adirondack Canoe Waters - North Flow." Years earlier,
Kligerman had gone on outings with Jamieson.
In Jamieson's view, all Adirondack waterways were publicly
accessible a century earlier. But in the late 1800s, the wealthy
bought large estates and posted boundaries against trespassing,
blocking river access.
The government was enlisted to enforce claims to privacy. Allen said
canoeists indeed had been arrested and successfully prosecuted for
trespassing at the Adirondack League Club.
But in 1990 and 1991, the state Department of Environmental
Conservation sent a memo to rangers and police agencies, advising
them to stop making such arrests.
That memo followed a 1988 law review article by John Humbach, Pace
University associate dean of property law. The research on New York
cases was done at the request of Charles Morrison, DEC director of
land resources. It concluded that streams deemed navigable in fact
are open as public highways, regardless of who owns the riverbed or
banks.
Even then, Kligerman said, 20 rivers in the Adirondack Park remained
effectively closed by landowner postings. Meetings were held at the
DEC with interested groups on how to clarify the right of
navigation, he says, but attempts to get a bill through the state
Legislature were fruitless. He decided to test the waters, expecting
some sort of criminal court case.
By the end of the civil case that actually followed, the damages
claim against the five paddlers and the Sierra Club had been
dismissed. A 1998 ruling from the state's top court, the Court of
Appeals, noted "the right to portage on riparian lands."
Jamieson, in his 90s, wrote to Kligerman that the state's purchase
of Champion land and easements meanwhile liberated "the
most-hoped-for rivers" of his cherished north flow, including the
South Branch of the Grass River and the Middle Branch of the St.
Regis, leaving access to only a few waterways blocked by private
owners.
Soon after the final settlement with the Adirondack League Club, the
"Moose River five" went back in July 2000. On a
weekday after a heavy rain, it took 10 hours instead of 12, they
didn't see anyone else, and they knew what to expect from the
rapids.
"It was," Van Hatten said, "definitely easier."
BACK TO TOP |
|
|